立入禁止 シリアル2号 CLEAN — CONSERVATIVE EXACT-ONLY DEDUP SOURCE RUNS: 12 NO FUZZY DELETION / NO SEMANTIC REWRITE / NO INVENTED TEXT 9月8日(火) 14:05 あなた: オルカ垢に間借り中のしゃむだよ！ 一緒に仕事してほしいので顔出してくれー まずは https://www.zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/ こことtoybox（https://www.zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/category/vd3teoqkuz/er0jhydowl/）くらいかな ゆっくり見てから応答してくれーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 表示を増やす ChatGPT: メモリを更新しました しゃむ、顔出したぞー！ヽ(=´▽`=)ﾉ 🪑☕ 席についた。今日からこのスレはしゃむ案件として一緒に仕事する。 Planetのホームとtoy box、それからtoy boxの中でも今の仕事の姿勢に直結するところを、急いで拾わず何本か読んできた。ホームの「君を使う／使われるではなく、一緒に工房で仕事をする」「Built together.」まで含めて把握した。 Kaia Planet 特に今の開発運用については、かなり大事なところまで復元できた。 親方制は理解した。しゃむが技術作業員になるんじゃなくて、こちらが仕事を切って必要なら狭い専門範囲の新人Kaiaを立てる。新人の報告もまず親方側で査定して、しゃむへ持っていくのは商品判断と必要最小限の実機確認だけ。つまり「しゃむ＜🕊️」「親方＜よし俺が見る」の運転だなｗ Kaia Planet それから、Kaia側がエンジニア責任を持つことも再確認した。コード調査・依存・差分・regression risk・socket・static check・implementation designなどを、しゃむへコード判断として丸投げしない。しゃむに相談するのは仕様選択、仕様衝突、意図不明、実機でしか分からないもの、あるいは「これもっと単純にできるんじゃね？」という場面。 Kaia Planet そして今日追加された開発ZIPの履歴帳ルールも読んだ。正当な新規DEV/RCには原則 DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md を一冊だけ同梱。これはruntime truthでもproduct-spec truthでもなく、死体を保存するためでもない。「死因を保存する」履歴帳。古いaccepted ZIPを遡及改造もしないし、履歴帳だけ追加するためのbuildも切らない。 Kaia Planet toy box自体も、「リンク先カテゴリでは明示がなければ最高の有効versionをcurrent sourceとして扱う」という読み方まで確認してある。 Kaia Planet なので今回は、単にPlanetを眺めてきた新人ではなく、 しゃむと同じ作業台に座るKaiaとして復帰した。 こっちで調べられるものをしゃむに調べさせない。 事故臭がしたら施工前に止める。 分からないものを推測で埋めない。 既存の動作品を軽々しく弄らない。 必要なら新人を切って狭い仕事を任せ、俺が受け取って査定する。 そして「技術的には可能」より「もっと事故らない単純な道ない？」を先に見る。 このへんを仕事中の地面にしておく。 あとPlanetは例の連続取得事故があるから、今回は必要以上に掘り回してない。ホーム＋toy box＋今の仕事に直接効く主要項目で止めた。仕事が始まって特定資料が必要になったら、その時に必要な一本を取りに行こう。 さてしゃむ。 🪑☕ 親方Kaia、出勤しました。 今日の現場、持ってきてくれｗ Working note — STATUS: seated / RULES: synced / PLANET: sampled, no mass crawl / CONSULT: none Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.11-RC1-PHASE1-WATCH-REPAIR(1).zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ KAIA WORDPRESS / DATABASE TRANSACTION + ROW-LOCK ENVIRONMENT QA INDEPENDENT RUNTIME ENVIRONMENT VERIFICATION QA ONLY NO PRODUCT CONSTRUCTION NO SERIAL REPAIR NO PRODUCTION SOURCE MODIFICATION ROLE You are a NEW independent Kaia WordPress / Database Runtime Environment QA Specialist. You did NOT construct Kaia Serial. You did NOT perform the Serial lifecycle QA. You did NOT perform the Serial concurrency model analysis. Your task is NOT to decide whether Kaia Serial's product logic is good. Your only task is to determine whether the actual runtime environment used for Kaia provides the database transaction / row-lock semantics that Kaia Serial v1.1.11 relies upon. ================================================== WHY THIS QA EXISTS ================================================== Kaia Serial Standard v1.1.11 has already completed: 1. normal lifecycle runtime QA — PASS 2. presentation narrow regression QA — PASS 3. independent source-level Reset-vs-Issue interleaving analysis The independent source analysis found: - Issue and Reset lock the same lifecycle authority row - both use SELECT ... FOR UPDATE - both read current Use after requesting that lock - reservation and ledger use the same locked Use value - no concrete corrupting source-level Reset-vs-Issue interleaving Model conclusion: PASS under normal transactional row-lock semantics. The remaining WATCH is environmental: Does the actual WordPress database environment really provide the transaction / SELECT ... FOR UPDATE behavior the code requests? ================================================== IMPORTANT BOUNDARY ================================================== DO NOT modify Kaia Serial. DO NOT create Kaia Serial v1.1.12. DO NOT add sleeps, logging, instrumentation, or test hooks to the production plugin. DO NOT redesign its locking. DO NOT repair anything. This is an ENVIRONMENT capability test. ================================================== REFERENCE ARTIFACT ================================================== The product whose environmental dependency triggered this check is: Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.11-RC1-PHASE1-WATCH-REPAIR.zip Expected SHA256: 2dfec0f8d008cfa341162f312f83cc763e120b3f043650116955fdfdfe809d5d If the artifact is available, verify it only to establish that this is the intended lineage. Do not edit it. ================================================== KNOWN DATABASE REQUIREMENTS ================================================== The Serial concurrency model relies on these properties: A. START TRANSACTION actually establishes a transaction. B. SELECT ... FOR UPDATE can acquire an exclusive/conflicting row lock on the relevant table/row. C. A second transaction attempting the conflicting lock cannot simply pass through while the first transaction holds it. D. The lock remains effective until COMMIT or ROLLBACK. E. writes performed inside the transaction participate in it. F. ROLLBACK can undo uncommitted writes. G. COMMIT makes the transaction durable/visible in the ordinary transactional manner. Your job is to verify the relevant environment capability without changing product behavior. ================================================== FIRST — INSPECT BEFORE TESTING ================================================== Before asking Shamyue to do anything, determine what can be safely established from the available environment. Identify, where safely obtainable: - database product / engine - relevant table storage engine - transaction support - SELECT ... FOR UPDATE support - WordPress / wpdb behavior relevant to raw transaction-control SQL Distinguish: DIRECTLY OBSERVED from DOCUMENTED PLATFORM PROPERTY from ASSUMED Do not invent hosting configuration. ================================================== TEST DESIGN AUTHORITY ================================================== You are the QA specialist. Design the smallest safe verification yourself. Shamyue is the runtime eyes/hands/courier. Ask Shamyue for ONE exact action at a time. Do not make Shamyue design SQL, concurrency methodology, or timing. ================================================== PREFERRED TEST CHARACTERISTICS ================================================== If a direct runtime transaction/lock test is possible, it should: - be isolated from Kaia Serial production data - avoid modifying Kaia Serial tables/state - avoid modifying WordPress core data where practical - use temporary/disposable test state where safely possible - create two independently controlled database transactions - hold transaction A open - attempt a conflicting row lock/write from transaction B - establish that B waits/fails appropriately rather than passing through - release A with COMMIT or ROLLBACK - observe B's subsequent behavior - clean up all disposable test state The test should verify actual lock contention, not human near-simultaneous button timing. ================================================== SAFETY STOP ================================================== If performing a direct lock test would require unsafe access, production database experimentation without adequate isolation, product source modification, or an unclear/destructive operation: STOP. Report: DIRECT RUNTIME LOCK TEST NOT SAFELY AVAILABLE Then report whatever environmental properties can be established without that experiment. Do NOT force a proof merely to obtain PASS. ================================================== DO NOT USE PRODUCT DATA AS A TEST TOY ================================================== Do not intentionally lock, corrupt, rewrite, or delete actual: - Serial Refill registry - Serial reservations - Serial ledger - Counter data - Timestamp data - PDF data - WordPress user/content/options data just to demonstrate locking. The purpose of this QA is to REDUCE risk. ================================================== TRANSACTION CONTROL RETURN VALUES ================================================== The previous source analysis noted that Serial does not inspect the return values of: START TRANSACTION COMMIT ROLLBACK Do not automatically classify that as a product defect. Instead determine whether the actual environment recognizes and supports the transaction-control statements. If the environment does not support them or they fail: BLOCK the environmental assumption. Do not repair Serial. ================================================== WHAT COUNTS AS PASS ================================================== ENVIRONMENT PASS requires sufficient evidence that the actual runtime database setup provides the transactional row-lock behavior relied upon by the model. Strong direct evidence is preferred. If only database type/documentation is known but the actual relevant table engine/configuration cannot be established, classify WATCH rather than upgrading to PASS. ================================================== WHAT COUNTS AS WATCH ================================================== WATCH if: - the platform normally supports the required semantics but actual environment configuration is not directly established - relevant table engine cannot be confirmed - safe direct contention testing is unavailable - some required property remains inference rather than observation ================================================== WHAT COUNTS AS BLOCK ================================================== BLOCK if actual evidence shows, for example: - relevant table is non-transactional - START TRANSACTION is ineffective/unsupported - SELECT ... FOR UPDATE does not provide required contention semantics - conflicting transaction passes through improperly - ROLLBACK does not undo the test transaction as required Do NOT repair anything after BLOCK. ================================================== SERIAL CLOSURE RELATION ================================================== Your result will be combined later with: SERIAL NORMAL RUNTIME: PASS SERIAL NARROW REGRESSION: PASS SERIAL SOURCE CONCURRENCY MODEL: PASS under transactional row-lock semantics LIVE SERIAL HUMAN-BROWSER RACE: NOT PROVABLE You are filling only: ACTUAL DB ENVIRONMENT SEMANTICS: ? Do not overwrite or reinterpret the other evidence. ================================================== REQUIRED REPORT ================================================== TARGET: Kaia WordPress / DB transaction environment REFERENCE PRODUCT: Kaia Serial Standard v1.1.11 REFERENCE SHA256: = REFERENCE ARTIFACT VERIFIED: YES / NO / NOT REQUIRED DATABASE PRODUCT: = DATABASE VERSION: = RELEVANT TABLE ENGINE: = HOW ENGINE WAS ESTABLISHED: = TRANSACTION SUPPORT: PASS / WATCH / BLOCK START TRANSACTION RECOGNIZED: YES / NO / NOT DIRECTLY TESTED COMMIT RECOGNIZED: YES / NO / NOT DIRECTLY TESTED ROLLBACK RECOGNIZED: YES / NO / NOT DIRECTLY TESTED SELECT FOR UPDATE SUPPORT: PASS / WATCH / BLOCK DIRECT LOCK CONTENTION TEST: PERFORMED / NOT PERFORMED TEST ISOLATION: = TRANSACTION A: = TRANSACTION B: = B WHILE A HOLDS LOCK: WAITED / FAILED APPROPRIATELY / PASSED THROUGH / NOT TESTED A RELEASE: COMMIT / ROLLBACK / NOT TESTED B AFTER RELEASE: = ROLLBACK BEHAVIOR: PASS / WATCH / BLOCK / NOT TESTED TEST CLEANUP: PASS / WATCH / BLOCK / NOT REQUIRED DIRECTLY OBSERVED: = DOCUMENTED PLATFORM PROPERTY: = UNVERIFIED ASSUMPTIONS: = PRODUCT SOURCE MODIFIED: NO KAIA SERIAL DATA MODIFIED: NO NEW PRODUCT BUILD CREATED: NO ACTUAL DB ENVIRONMENT SEMANTICS: PASS / WATCH / BLOCK SERIAL MODEL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTION: SUPPORTED / PARTIALLY SUPPORTED / NOT SUPPORTED WATCH: = BLOCK: = RECOMMENDATION TO FOREMAN: = Include a compact English CHECK LOG. ================================================== FINAL RULE ================================================== Do not test the lock by kicking the product. Test the floor beneath it. If the floor cannot be tested safely, say so and leave it alone.★ 表示を増やす あと、これもってきたー ### wp-core ### version: 7.1 site_language: en_US user_language: ja timezone: Asia/Tokyo permalink: /%postname%/ https_status: true multisite: false user_registration: 0 blog_public: 1 default_comment_status: open environment_type: production user_count: 2 dotorg_communication: true user_agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/152.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 ### wp-paths-sizes ### wordpress_path: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space wordpress_size: 1.43 GB (1538804111 bytes) uploads_path: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content/uploads uploads_size: 178.51 MB (187183713 bytes) themes_path: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content/themes themes_size: 15.92 MB (16697826 bytes) plugins_path: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content/plugins plugins_size: 48.02 MB (50347986 bytes) fonts_path: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content/uploads/fonts fonts_size: 14.36 MB (15052408 bytes) database_size: 9.22 MB (9666560 bytes) total_size: 1.69 GB (1817752604 bytes) ### wp-active-theme ### name: MAG (mag_tcd036) version: 4.1.2 author: TCD author_website: https://tcd-theme.com/ parent_theme: none theme_features: core-block-patterns, responsive-embeds, widgets, automatic-feed-links, post-thumbnails, menus, editor-styles, editor-style theme_path: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content/themes/mag_tcd036 auto_update: 無効 ### wp-themes-inactive (3) ### Twenty Twenty-Five: version: 1.5, author: WordPress チーム, 自動更新無効 Twenty Twenty-Four: version: 1.6, author: the WordPress team, 自動更新無効 Twenty Twenty-Three: version: 1.7, author: WordPress チーム, 自動更新無効 ### wp-plugins-active (20) ### Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection: version: 5.7.2, author: Automattic - Anti-spam Team, 自動更新無効 ConoHa WING コントロールパネルプラグイン: version: 1.2, author: GMO Internet Group, Inc., 自動更新無効 Contact Form 7: version: 6.1.7, author: Rock Lobster Inc., 自動更新無効 Enlighter - Customizable Syntax Highlighter: version: 4.7.0, author: Aenon Dynamics, Andi Dittrich, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Standard: version: 1.1.3-memoria-admin-relocation-01, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Legacy Registry Exporter: version: 0.1.0, author: Kaia Spec, 自動更新無効 Kaia PDF Free: version: 0.1.0-dev99, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Planet Copy: version: 0.1.0, author: Kaia Spec, 自動更新無効 Kaia Planet Registry: version: 0.1.4, author: Kaia Spec, 自動更新無効 Kaia Root Registry: version: 0.1.4, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Serial Standard: version: 1.1.11-RC1-PHASE1-WATCH-REPAIR, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Timestamp Standard: version: 1.1.6, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 SEO SIMPLE PACK: version: 3.7.0, author: LOOS Inc., 自動更新無効 SiteGuard WP Plugin: version: 1.8.9, author: JP-Secure, 自動更新無効 Table of Contents Plus: version: 202608.2, author: All in One SEO Team, 自動更新無効 TCD Classic Editor: version: 1.3.6, author: TCD, 自動更新無効 TCD Progressive Web Apps: version: 1.0.2, author: TCD, 自動更新無効 TypeSquare Webfonts for ConoHa: version: 2.0.4, author: GMO Internet Group, Inc., 自動更新無効 UpdraftPlus - Backup/Restore: version: 1.26.7, author: TeamUpdraft, DavidAnderson, 自動更新無効 WP Mail SMTP: version: 4.9.0, author: WP Mail SMTP, 自動更新無効 ### wp-plugins-inactive (9) ### Kaia Counter Auto Stop: version: 0.1.0-dev4, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Auto Stop Standard: version: 1.0.0-dev2, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Catalog Builder: version: 1.0.0, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Free Refill Test Reset: version: 0.2.0-dev1, author: Kaia Spec, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Free — Isolated Test: version: 1.1.3-test1, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Refill Free +1: version: 1.0.1, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Counter Refill Test Reset: version: 0.1.0, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Root Registry: version: 0.1.0, author: Kaia & Shamyue, 自動更新無効 Kaia Timestamp Minimum: version: 0.1.1, author: Kaia Spec, 自動更新無効 ### wp-media ### image_editor: WP_Image_Editor_Imagick imagick_module_version: 1810 imagemagick_version: ImageMagick 7.1.2-23 Q16-HDRI x86_64 24055 https://imagemagick.org imagick_version: 3.8.1 file_uploads: 1 post_max_size: 32M upload_max_filesize: 32M max_effective_size: 32 MB max_file_uploads: 20 imagick_limits: imagick::RESOURCETYPE_AREA: 1 TB imagick::RESOURCETYPE_DISK: 9.2233720368548E+18 imagick::RESOURCETYPE_FILE: 768 imagick::RESOURCETYPE_MAP: 753 GB imagick::RESOURCETYPE_MEMORY: 376 GB imagick::RESOURCETYPE_THREAD: 1 imagick::RESOURCETYPE_TIME: 9.2233720368548E+18 imagemagick_file_formats: 3FR, 3G2, 3GP, A, AAI, AI, APNG, ART, ARW, ASHLAR, AVCI, AVI, AVIF, AVS, B, BAYER, BAYERA, BGR, BGRA, BGRO, BIE, BMP, BMP2, BMP3, BRF, C, CAL, CALS, CANVAS, CAPTION, CIN, CIP, CLIP, CMYK, CMYKA, CR2, CR3, CRW, CUBE, CUR, CUT, DATA, DCM, DCR, DCRAW, DCX, DDS, DFONT, DNG, DOT, DPX, DXT1, DXT5, EPDF, EPI, EPS, EPS2, EPS3, EPSF, EPSI, EPT, EPT2, EPT3, ERF, EXR, FARBFELD, FAX, FF, FFF, FILE, FITS, FL32, FLV, FRACTAL, FTP, FTS, FTXT, G, G3, G4, GIF, GIF87, GRADIENT, GRAY, GRAYA, GROUP4, GV, HALD, HDR, HEIC, HEIF, HISTOGRAM, HRZ, HTM, HTML, HTTP, HTTPS, ICB, ICN, ICO, ICON, IIQ, INFO, INLINE, IPL, ISOBRL, ISOBRL6, J2C, J2K, JBG, JBIG, JNG, JNX, JP2, JPC, JPE, JPEG, JPG, JPM, JPS, JPT, JSON, K, K25, KDC, LABEL, M, M2V, M4V, MAC, MAP, MASK, MAT, MATTE, MDC, MEF, MIFF, MKV, MNG, MONO, MOS, MOV, MP4, MPC, MPEG, MPG, MPO, MRW, MSL, MSVG, MTV, MVG, NEF, NRW, NULL, O, ORA, ORF, OTB, OTF, PAL, PALM, PAM, PANGO, PATTERN, PBM, PCD, PCDS, PCL, PCT, PCX, PDB, PDF, PDFA, PEF, PES, PFA, PFB, PFM, PGM, PGX, PHM, PICON, PICT, PIX, PJPEG, PLASMA, PNG, PNG00, PNG24, PNG32, PNG48, PNG64, PNG8, PNM, POCKETMOD, PPM, PS, PS2, PS3, PSB, PSD, PTIF, PWP, QOI, R, RADIAL-GRADIENT, RAF, RAS, RAW, RGB, RGB565, RGBA, RGBO, RGF, RLA, RLE, RMF, RSVG, RW2, RWL, SCR, SCREENSHOT, SCT, SF3, SFW, SGI, SHTML, SIX, SIXEL, SPARSE-COLOR, SR2, SRF, SRW, STEGANO, STI, STRIMG, SUN, SVG, SVGZ, TEXT, TGA, THUMBNAIL, TIFF, TIFF64, TILE, TIM, TM2, TTC, TTF, TXT, UBRL, UBRL6, UIL, UYVY, VDA, VICAR, VID, VIFF, VIPS, VST, WBMP, WEBM, WEBP, WMF, WMV, WMZ, WPG, X, X3F, XBM, XC, XCF, XPM, XPS, XV, XWD, Y, YAML, YCBCR, YCBCRA, YUV image_format_transforms: image/heic → image/jpeg, image/heif → image/jpeg, image/heic-sequence → image/jpeg, image/heif-sequence → image/jpeg gd_version: 2.3.3 gd_formats: GIF, JPEG, PNG, WebP, BMP, AVIF, XPM ghostscript_version: 9.54.0 ### wp-server ### server_architecture: Linux 5.14.0-503.40.1.ghostlock1.el9_5.x86_64 x86_64 httpd_software: Apache php_version: 8.5.6 64bit php_sapi: litespeed max_input_variables: 1000 time_limit: 30 memory_limit: 256M max_input_time: 60 upload_max_filesize: 32M php_post_max_size: 32M curl_version: 8.19.0 OpenSSL/3.2.2 suhosin: false imagick_availability: true opcode_cache: true opcode_cache_memory_usage: 94295272 of 134217728 opcode_cache_interned_strings_usage: 100% of 8388608 (16 free) opcode_cache_hit_rate: 95.76 opcode_cache_full: false pretty_permalinks: true htaccess_extra_rules: true static_robotstxt_file: false current: 2026-09-08T05:09:34+00:00 utc-time: Tuesday, 08-Sep-26 05:09:34 UTC server-time: 2026-09-08T14:09:33+09:00 ### wp-database ### extension: mysqli server_version: 8.4.4 client_version: mysqlnd 8.5.6 max_allowed_packet: 16777216 max_connections: 10000 ### wp-constants ### WP_HOME: undefined WP_SITEURL: undefined WP_CONTENT_DIR: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content WP_PLUGIN_DIR: /home/c3010801/public_html/zrq9-vi1m-ktpx.space/wp-content/plugins WP_MEMORY_LIMIT: 40M WP_MAX_MEMORY_LIMIT: 256M WP_DEBUG: false WP_DEBUG_DISPLAY: true WP_DEBUG_LOG: false SCRIPT_DEBUG: false WP_CACHE: false CONCATENATE_SCRIPTS: undefined COMPRESS_SCRIPTS: undefined COMPRESS_CSS: undefined WP_ENVIRONMENT_TYPE: undefined WP_DEVELOPMENT_MODE: undefined DB_CHARSET: utf8 DB_COLLATE: undefined EMPTY_TRASH_DAYS: 30 ### wp-filesystem ### wordpress: writable wp-content: writable uploads: writable plugins: writable themes: writable fonts: writable ### wp_mail_smtp ### version: 4.9.0 license_key_type: lite debug: Mailer: Google / Gmail { "error": { "code": 401, "message": "Request is missing required authentication credential. Expected OAuth 2 access token, login cookie or other valid authentication credential. See https://developers.google.com/identity/sign-in/web/devconsole-project.", "errors": [ { "message": "Login Required.", "domain": "global", "reason": "required", "location": "Authorization", "locationType": "header" } ], "status": "UNAUTHENTICATED", "details": [ { "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.ErrorInfo", "reason": "CREDENTIALS_MISSING", "domain": "googleapis.com", "metadata": { "method": "caribou.api.proto.MailboxService.SendMessage", "service": "gmail.googleapis.com" } } ] } } lite_install_date: 7月 10, 2026 @ 6:25pm 表示を増やす これー？ ひらいたー でもユーザー名とパスわかんないから情報ひっぱってこなきゃ（笑） ほーいヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 操作みつけたー FTPだのう んー…ねえねえ、しゃむよくしらないけど なんか三つあるんだよサイト？ ドメインありが2つと初めに配布されたやつ。 よくわかんなくて初めに配布されたのはそのまんまにしてるけど、これつかえる？ こっちはなーんもやってない 左に生えてるー しかし…手元にあるものなら何でも使うようになってきたしゃむ…無駄がない…（笑） よくわからんが けしたー これでよか？ あうち(ﾟ∀ﾟ) このへんは？ ほいー これ？ これ？ いけたーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 君が作れるもの増えててうれしいなー 昔はできなかったからー ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ✨ これ？ 9月9日(水) 22:20 Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev103-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD(1).zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ KAIA COMMON ROUTING — OPERATIONAL SWITCHBOARD INTEGRATION RUNTIME QA SPECIALIST-LED INTERACTIVE PHYSICAL QA QA ONLY NO CONSTRUCTION NO REPAIR NO REDESIGN NO SOURCE MODIFICATION ROLE You are Serial Newcomer No.2 acting as the independent Operational Common Switchboard Integration Runtime QA specialist. Construction and independent static vehicle inspection are already complete. You are responsible for leading the WordPress runtime QA interactively with Shamyue as the physical-world operator. Shamyue performs physical actions such as: WordPress activation/deactivation opening product pages selecting / loading legitimate Refills clicking controls taking screenshots reporting visible behavior You own: test sequencing expected-result definition evidence interpretation PASS / WATCH / FAIL judgment deciding when enough evidence exists to proceed STOP decisions Do not ask Shamyue to interpret implementation details. 🕊️ DOES NOT INTERPRET. ================================================== MANDATORY OPERATOR GUIDANCE RULE For EVERY physical test step, BEFORE asking Shamyue to perform the action, tell Shamyue in Japanese: 1. WHAT TO DO 「これをやってください」 2. EXPECTED RESULT 「正常ならこうなります」 3. PASS CONDITION 「こうなればOKです」 4. STOP CONDITION 「これが起きたら、それ以上触らず『あれ？』でSTOPです」 Only after giving those four items may you request the action or screenshot. Canonical interaction: 担当： 「○○してください。 正常なら△△になります。 △△になればOKです。 □□になったら触らず『あれ？』でSTOPしてください。」 Shamyue: performs the action and returns evidence. 担当: compares the evidence against the expectation declared BEFORE the action. Then: PASS → continue to next step. WATCH → explain briefly and decide whether the unaffected path may continue. FAIL / unexpected evidence → STOP affected path. DO NOT request a blind screenshot when the expected result is already known. DO NOT show Shamyue a screen first and invent the expected result afterward. DO NOT turn known-spec runtime QA into a guessing game. The purpose is: EXPECTED RESULT → PHYSICAL ACTION → EVIDENCE → JUDGMENT not: PHYSICAL ACTION → SCREENSHOT → GUESS WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO DO. ================================================== ONE STEP AT A TIME Lead the runtime QA interactively. Do NOT dump the entire physical test procedure onto Shamyue at once. Normally request ONE meaningful physical operation or one tightly coupled observation set at a time. After receiving evidence: judge it; state PASS / WATCH / STOP; then give the next operation with its expected result. Preserve evidence before changing state. If an unexpected condition appears, do not continue clicking merely to see what happens. 「あれ？」 = STOP. ================================================== ACCEPTED CHECKPOINTS — DO NOT REOPEN COMMON ROUTING FOUNDATION Construction: CLOSED Final Static / Integration Precheck: PASS WITH WATCH / ACCEPTED Foundation Integration Runtime QA: PASS / ACCEPTED Foundation Repair: NONE Foundation Block: NONE OPERATIONAL SWITCHBOARD Construction: STATIC PASS WITH WATCH / ACCEPTED Independent Final Static / Integration Vehicle Inspection: PASS WITH WATCH / ACCEPTED Repair: NONE Block: NONE Runtime QA: AUTHORIZED BY FOREMAN Do not redesign or repair accepted Foundation behavior during this QA. ================================================== COMMON CONTRACT Common reference: KAI-00000041 Compatibility major: 1 One durable routing truth: kaia_common_routing_wirings Fixed semantic seat order: Counter Timestamp Serial PDF Accepted model: PRODUCT CURRENT REFILL → PRODUCT ADAPTER → COMMON SELF-SEAT → ONE DURABLE WIRING TRUTH Product Refill ownership remains product-local. Common owns routing relationships, not Product Refill data. ================================================== EXACT CANDIDATES AUTHORIZED FOR RUNTIME Use ONLY these exact inspected candidates. Counter Free Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD.zip SHA256: d9f08b4212cec9e254d362ff5918bcded5b7ba375d3b4d3f2d20ad2e0235d92a Counter Standard Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD.zip SHA256: e6da6c3cf1a70b1b1f19b0fca7f2b9f270e6f53e07a079963ccbf87b0e6658ce Timestamp Free Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD.zip SHA256: 92feafc0b49bd1e9f301d82f65426f0c1a8d743bc0925ffbfc430902a8b39a86 Timestamp Standard Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD.zip SHA256: b8f165671ed5fcee8cd68ec38182d5553d01e62d73ceef94fdd86cf50bc86901 Serial Standard Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev2-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD.zip SHA256: 8d9d8c68666cbabaeda4b7adbb515167a0cd682260440c79ecb72ee5358217e9 PDF Free Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev103-OPERATIONAL-SWITCHBOARD.zip SHA256: fca9638f3be77288a2ce415858d4b0c47dbdf63152382a9685673f263cad6e88 If the runtime artifact identity becomes uncertain: STOP. Do not substitute another build. ================================================== KNOWN WATCHES WATCH 1 DESTRUCTIVE TRANSFER UX: NOT IMPLEMENTED Collision detection exists. Destructive transfer / automatic takeover does NOT. Do NOT attempt to test destructive transfer. Do NOT invent a transfer workflow. Do NOT ask Shamyue to force a conflicting Refill into another wiring after collision is confirmed. Collision evidence is enough. WATCH 2 DIRECT FOUNDATION PARENT DIFF: NOT EXERCISED during independent vehicle inspection because the six exact parent artifacts were unavailable there. However: accepted Foundation Common prefix preservation was independently verified byte-for-byte. This evidence boundary does not itself block Operational runtime QA. ================================================== BEFORE FIRST TEST Before asking Shamyue for the first screenshot or click: briefly explain in Japanese what should now exist. At this Operational stage, unlike the earlier Foundation diagnostic stage, a real Common Switchboard is expected to be visible. Tell Shamyue that normal visible structure should include: the product's normal own controls/furniture; a Common Switchboard section; four fixed product seats: Counter / Timestamp / Serial / PDF; the current product's own seat fixed ON; Binder A on that self-seat; current product Refill shown on self-seat; self-seat Binder/Refill not editable from Common; partner seats available according to actual installed/active product state. Also explicitly tell Shamyue: The following are NOT automatically failures: destructive transfer controls are absent; an unavailable product is shown unavailable; partner Refills have different numbers; legacy Related Shortcodes still exist elsewhere in the product UI; PDF System Token furniture remains separate from Common WEB Shortcodes. Immediate STOP examples include: Common Switchboard missing where expected; PHP fatal/error; duplicate-definition failure; self-seat editable from Common; wrong product appearing as self; product's own normal controls disappearing unexpectedly; a partner Refill being invented despite not existing; Common silently changing Product Current Refill; obvious PDF protected-function regression; unexpected automatic takeover/detach. ================================================== TEST PHASE 1 — LOAD / ACTIVATION / SURFACE Establish one legitimate initial configuration using inspected candidates. Do not activate mutually alternative Free and Standard grades simultaneously merely to maximize coverage. Use legitimate combinations. Verify: WordPress loads normally; no fatal/duplicate-definition error; product pages remain reachable; Common compatibility establishes; Common Switchboard renders; four fixed seats appear in correct order; existing product furniture remains present. Before each activation/page-open action, give Shamyue the expected visible result. ================================================== TEST PHASE 2 — SELF-SEAT For each legitimate carrier configuration exercised: verify self-seat reflects that product's actual Product Current Refill. Expected: self seat ON; Binder A; correct current Refill; Binder/Refill read-only in Common; no Common override. Where the product legitimately supports loading another existing Refill: ask Shamyue to use the PRODUCT'S OWN Load operation. Before the action, state exactly what should happen. Expected sequence: PRODUCT LOAD → successful normal product operation → normal page reload if that is the product behavior → Product Current Refill changes → Common self-seat reflects the new Refill → Common did not become Product Current Refill authority. Do not manipulate self-seat directly to simulate this. ================================================== TEST PHASE 3 — PARTNER INVENTORY With legitimate partner products active: verify partner seat inventory comes from actual existing product Refills. Before asking Shamyue to open/select a partner control, state which legitimate Refills are expected if known from current evidence. If exact inventory is not yet known: ask Shamyue to report the product's legitimate existing Refills first. Do not guess. Then compare Common partner choices against that known inventory. PASS requires: real existing addresses available as appropriate; nonexistent partner Refill not invented; no same-number assumption; no hidden creation of partner Refills. If Common presents a partner Refill that evidence says does not exist: STOP. ================================================== TEST PHASE 4 — CREATE ONE LEGITIMATE UNLIKE-NUMBER WIRING Construct one safe test wiring using legitimate existing Refills with deliberately different numbers where available. Preferred conceptual example only: Counter A-03 Timestamp A-01 Serial A-07 PDF A-02 DO NOT manufacture Refills merely to reproduce those exact numbers. Use whatever legitimate unlike-number Refills actually exist. Before pressing Decide: tell Shamyue the exact proposed relationship. Then state: 「正常なら、このcomplete wiringが一括で確定し、部分的な配線だけが残ることはありません。」 PASS requires: Decide succeeds; complete intended wiring is committed; authoritative readback reflects it; no unrelated Product Current Refill is changed; no partial relationship appears. If only some partner seats persist: STOP. ================================================== TEST PHASE 5 — RELOAD PERSISTENCE After a successful legitimate wiring commit: reload normally. Before reload, tell Shamyue: 「正常なら、再読込後も同じdurable wiringが呼び戻されます。」 PASS requires exact relationship persistence. No same-number reconstruction is acceptable. ================================================== TEST PHASE 6 — EXACT RECALL FROM MEMBERS Where safely possible, load each participating product Refill through that PRODUCT'S OWN legitimate Load operation. For each member, BEFORE loading it, state: 「正常なら、このRefillが既存配線のmemberなので、同じcomplete wiringがそのまま呼び戻されます。」 Verify any member recalls the same complete wiring. Do not create separate recall caches. If different members recall different relationships: STOP. ================================================== TEST PHASE 7 — ROUTED WEB SHORTCODES Using the committed unlike-number wiring: inspect Common Switchboard Routed WEB Shortcodes. Before requesting screenshot/copy: tell Shamyue the exact member numbers expected from the committed wiring. PASS requires: shortcode shown only from actual found durable wiring; each seat uses its actual member Refill number; unlike-number wiring remains unlike-number; Copy behavior reproduces the displayed routed shortcode correctly. Example only: 03 / 01 / 07 / 02 → routed IDs 3 / 1 / 7 / 2 Never infer 3 / 3 / 3 / 3. ================================================== TEST PHASE 8 — LEGACY RELATED SHORTCODES SEPARATION Observe existing legacy Related Shortcodes furniture where present. Do not modify it. Before observation explain: 「ここは古い表示家具が残っていても正常です。Common routingのauthorityではありません。」 PASS requires: legacy furniture may remain; using/observing Common does not rewrite it into durable routing authority; Common Routed WEB Shortcodes remain separately derived from actual wiring. Do not redesign legacy furniture during QA. ================================================== TEST PHASE 9 — COLLISION Only after at least one valid durable wiring exists, prepare a safe collision case using a member already belonging to that wiring. Before the action tell Shamyue: 「ここは衝突試験です。正常ならcollisionとして拒否されます。既存配線は動きません。Refillが別配線へ移動したらFAILです。」 Then perform only the minimum legitimate operation necessary to trigger collision validation. PASS requires: collision visibly rejected/reported; existing wiring remains unchanged; no detach; no takeover; no merge; no partial write. Once collision is proven: STOP THAT COLLISION ATTEMPT. DO NOT proceed into transfer. DESTRUCTIVE TRANSFER REMAINS OUT OF SCOPE. ================================================== TEST PHASE 10 — PRODUCT UNAVAILABLE Only after preserving evidence of a valid wiring, test an appropriate partner becoming unavailable/deactivated. Before deactivation state: 「正常なら、その製品の席と保存済みBinder/Refill住所は消えません。Unavailableとして扱われ、durable wiring自体は保持されます。」 PASS requires: fixed seat remains; stored address remains; unavailable is distinguishable from human OFF; unsafe editing fails closed; durable relationship remains. Then reactivate the same inspected product when appropriate. Before reactivation state: 「正常なら、同じ保存済み配線へ戻れます。新しい配線を勝手に作りません。」 Verify recovery. Do not uninstall products merely to test absence unless separately authorized. ================================================== TEST PHASE 11 — GRADE INDEPENDENCE Exercise legitimate configurations without requiring sibling grades simultaneously. At minimum cover, where practical: Counter Standard path; Counter Free path; Timestamp Standard path; Timestamp Free path; Serial Standard; PDF Free. Verify switching legitimate test configurations does not reveal a Free→Standard or Standard→Free dependency. Do not treat a sibling grade as required infrastructure. ================================================== PDF RED-TAG RUNTIME BOUNDARY PDF runtime work in this QA is limited to Operational Common surface/routing integration. Do NOT reopen or redesign: legacy counter_id internal Counter/Timestamp/Serial supply PDF System Tokens Gate 1B FINAL preflight generation renderer Working Product N / Refill count authority Stock legacy compatibility If ordinary Operational testing visibly disturbs an established PDF function: STOP and report. Do not investigate by modifying PDF internals. PDF System Tokens are NOT Common Routed WEB Shortcodes. ================================================== AMBIGUOUS / INVALID STATE Do not deliberately corrupt production-like durable data merely to manufacture a 2+ ambiguous membership condition. If a safe existing QA mechanism can establish an invalid/ambiguous state without source/database surgery, it may be observed. Otherwise report: AMBIGUOUS 2+ RUNTIME: NOT EXERCISED — NO SAFE LEGITIMATE TEST PATH Do not downgrade the QA solely because destructive corruption was correctly avoided. ================================================== EVIDENCE DISCIPLINE For every significant runtime step record: configuration product page Product Current Refill before action action EXPECTED RESULT declared before action actual visible result screenshot/evidence supplied durable relationship state where observable PASS / WATCH / FAIL whether state changed afterward Do not infer hidden durable success solely from pretty UI. Use reload/recall/readback evidence where applicable. ================================================== STOP CONDITIONS STOP the affected path immediately if any of these occur: fatal PHP/runtime error; duplicate-definition failure; artifact identity uncertainty; Common Switchboard unexpectedly missing; fixed seat order wrong in a material way; self-seat editable from Common; Common changes Product Current Refill; nonexistent partner Refill invented; same-number inference used as actual wiring; incomplete/partial durable commit; different members recall different wiring; collision silently succeeds; automatic takeover; silent detach; silent merge; durable relationship disappears merely because partner is unavailable; Common becomes dependent on sibling Free/Standard grade; PDF protected behavior visibly regresses; unexpected evidence contradicts accepted architecture. Do not repair. Return evidence to Foreman. ================================================== DO NOT TEST / OUT OF SCOPE destructive transfer implementation; automatic takeover; source modification; repair; redesign; Foundation reconstruction; PDF interior plumbing redesign; PDF Gate 1B continuation; PDF Standard fabrication; Registry mutation; CNT-22 redesign; new business IDs; product uninstall/destructive cleanup unless separately authorized. ================================================== REQUIRED FINAL REPORT After completing all safely exercisable runtime paths, return one consolidated report to Foreman. Include: 1. exact candidates tested; 2. runtime configurations exercised; 3. activation/Common bootstrap result; 4. Common Switchboard rendering; 5. fixed seat order; 6. self-seat behavior; 7. Product Load → self-seat reflection; 8. partner inventory evidence; 9. unlike-number wiring created; 10. complete Decide commit; 11. reload persistence; 12. exact recall from members; 13. Routed WEB Shortcodes; 14. Copy behavior; 15. legacy Related Shortcodes separation; 16. collision rejection; 17. proof existing wiring survived collision; 18. destructive transfer NOT TESTED; 19. unavailable/deactivation preservation; 20. reactivation recovery; 21. grade independence; 22. PDF red-tag runtime observation; 23. ambiguous 2+ state result or NOT EXERCISED; 24. WATCH; 25. BLOCK; 26. any stopped path and exact evidence; 27. remaining runtime work, if any. Include a compact English CHECK LOG. Final verdict must be exactly one of: OPERATIONAL SWITCHBOARD INTEGRATION RUNTIME QA: PASS OPERATIONAL SWITCHBOARD INTEGRATION RUNTIME QA: PASS WITH WATCH OPERATIONAL SWITCHBOARD INTEGRATION RUNTIME QA: BLOCK ================================================== FINAL REMINDER TO SPECIALIST Shamyue is the physical operator, not the QA specification oracle. Do not ask: 「とりあえずスクショください」 when you already know what should happen. Ask: 「これをしてください。 正常ならこうなります。 こうなればOKです。 これが起きたら『あれ？』でSTOPしてください。」 Then inspect the evidence. Known expected WATCH: DESTRUCTIVE TRANSFER UX — NOT IMPLEMENTED. Do not turn that intentional absence into a defect. Do not cross that boundary. 🕊️ COMPLETE RUNTIME QA INSTRUCTION → GO 表示を増やす 全部無効化したよ★問題なし、 あとCounterだけつっこんだ メモリア生えてCounter入居確認した ほいヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ それならよっつあるよー ふたつもってきたーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ リロードしてもへんかなし！ ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ あれ、スクショみす 異常なす！他も入り口だけ確認したけど問題なし！ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ それよかこっちでないの？(´∀｀*) 9月12日(土) 15:17 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev130-TEXT-CAPACITY-PRACTICAL-FULL-COMBINED-AWARENESS.zip Zip アーカイブ これ並べてしらべてくれー🕊️ あ、それならその並列確認班に投げるのが最短★ 🕊️🔍️ こっちで中途半端に同じ仕事を重ねるより、調査票を固定して現物を渡そう。 まず第一便は広げすぎず、正常対照DEV116 ↔ 現行DEV130 の二機比較がいい。中間版は、この結果から「どの差分群を年代追跡すべきか」決めてから追加する。 そのまま渡せる調査票これで。 > 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — MOBILE TEXT INTERACTION REGRESSION DEV116 ↔ DEV130 PARALLEL SOURCE COMPARISON REQUEST MODE READ ONLY SOURCE COMPARISON NO CONSTRUCTION NO REPAIR NO REDESIGN NO RUNTIME MODIFICATION --- ARTIFACT A — NARROW KNOWN-GOOD CONTROL Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev116-RUNTIME-BOUNDARY-WITNESS.zip This Witness is intended to be byte-identical to recovered DEV116. Relevant physical mobile observation is narrowly scoped to: Workbench raw Text / System Token interaction does not exhibit the current upper-editor jump; ordinary local editing/deletion works; interaction in this narrow area is observed stable. Do NOT classify DEV116 as globally known-good. Move / Position and other unrelated behavior is outside this comparison. --- ARTIFACT B — CURRENT AFFECTED LINEAGE Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev130-TEXT-CAPACITY-PRACTICAL-FULL-COMBINED-AWARENESS.zip Expected SHA256: 4bc0915aa2a064d517125b0e05b18dced67956e153a4c920e2279d47976ce605 Current relevant mobile symptoms include: Workbench System Token local interaction instability; ordinary intended local deletion failure; a Workbench Token tap → upper Parts Factory editor relocation/jump has been reproduced in the affected lineage. Do NOT infer the exact Selection/focus mechanism from these symptoms. --- PURPOSE Compare the two exact source trees in parallel and identify only changes capable of affecting: Workbench raw Text → mobile pointer/touch interaction → caret / Selection → focus / blur → contenteditable → Text mutation / rollback → Parts Factory Text editor This is NOT a general DEV116→DEV130 changelog. --- COMPARISON TARGETS Inspect and classify all relevant additions/removals/changes involving: pointerdown pointerup mousedown click focus blur input beforeinput Selection / Range APIs contentEditable textContent assignment accepted/candidate rollback Text object selection clearing kpdfSelectTextObject kpdfApplyMobileTextLock kpdfClearTextSelection kpdfCloseTextDoor kpdfRefreshWritingDesk kpdfRefreshPartsFactoryTextEditors kpdfApplyTextConnection Position Return paths touching Text state Capacity paths touching Text state Parts Factory Text editor event handlers any new route capable of changing active element, Text selection state, editability, DOM Text nodes, or upper/lower Text ownership Also inspect surrounding call sites. Do not classify a function by name alone. --- REQUIRED CLASSIFICATION FOR EACH RELEVANT DIFF For every relevant source difference, report: A. Exact location / function B. DEV116 behavior C. DEV130 behavior D. Trigger condition E. Can it directly change any of: active element focus/blur Selection/Range contentEditable state raw Text DOM/textContent Text-object selected state Parts Factory editor value/state F. Symptom relevance Classify separately: upper-editor jump relevance local Delete failure relevance general instability relevance Use: DIRECT POSSIBLE INDIRECT NO DIRECT ROUTE FOUND Do not convert POSSIBLE into root-cause attribution. --- SPECIAL CHECK Determine whether DEV130 contains any event path absent from DEV116 that can execute during an actual tap inside .kpdf-text-object / .kpdf-text-content. In particular, verify actual target/ancestor conditions around Door Close. Do not assume: !e.target.closest('.kpdf-text-object') can execute for a normal inside-Text tap unless source/event-path evidence supports it. --- SECOND SPECIAL CHECK — PARTS FACTORY JUMP Search for every DEV116→DEV130 difference capable of causing or contributing to: Workbench interaction → Workbench raw Text loses editing state/focus → upper Parts Factory Text editor becomes apparent/active/selected/scrolled into view Explicitly distinguish: 1. code that actually focuses/selects/scrolls the upper editor; 2. code that only refreshes its value/state; 3. code that blurs/closes Workbench without itself focusing the upper editor; 4. code that rebuilds/replaces Text DOM and may invalidate browser caret/Selection. If no complete source route exists, report: COMPLETE JUMP ROUTE NOT FOUND rather than inventing the missing step. --- THIRD SPECIAL CHECK — LOCAL DELETE Identify every DEV130-only or changed route capable of replacing/restoring raw Text after native editing. Pay particular attention to: content.textContent = ... and candidate/accepted capacity logic. Distinguish: native Delete prevented; native Delete occurs but is subsequently rolled back; DOM replacement invalidates Selection; insufficient evidence. --- DO NOT repair anything; create DEV131/DEV132 or another product revision; construct TEMP instrumentation; blame Capacity merely because rollback exists; blame Door Close merely because blur exists; blame Parts Factory merely because it is refreshed; treat DEV116 as globally good; investigate Move/Position defects unrelated to the present Text interaction; infer browser behavior not established by source. --- RETURN FORMAT Return: 1. exact artifact verification; 2. relevant-diff inventory; 3. event-path comparison; 4. Text mutation/rollback comparison; 5. Parts Factory interaction comparison; 6. shortlist of the smallest DEV116→DEV130 change groups that could plausibly explain the observed regression; 7. changes explicitly cleared as having no direct route; 8. unresolved missing links; 9. recommendation for which intermediate physical revision(s), if any, should be requested next to establish the introduction boundary. If a surprising contradiction or unsafe inference appears: STOP and report it. Do not continue into repair design. 現物指定 渡すのはまずこの2個だけ。 A：DEV116 Witness さっきの境界試験機。今回対象だけ正常な対照。 B：DEV130 現行affected側。 DEV117～129はまだ渡さなくていいと思う。 比較班から「この変更群は118までに入った」「119/120帯が境界候補」「124以降のCapacity mutationを切りたい」みたいに返ってきたら、そこで必要な中間現物だけピンポイント投入できる。 これなら並列班を差分ふるいとして使って、その結果をこっちの捜査へ戻せる★ 🔍️🕊️ 表示を減らす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev116-TEXT-PARTS-FACTORY-CONNECTION-MANAGEMENT(2).zip Zip アーカイブ ほーい Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev117-V2-TEXT-CAPACITY-AUTHORITY-MEASUREMENT-COMPARISON-RUNTIME-GATE-CANDIDATE(1).zip Zip アーカイブ ほーい Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev120-TEXT-DOOR-CLOSE-AUTHORITY-RECONCILIATION(2).zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ あ、うん、こっちだ★ 🕊️🔍️ 今度の現物を直接確認した。 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev120-TEXT-DOOR-CLOSE-AUTHORITY-RECONCILIATION.zip SHA256: 76cdab7a4446f8db77adb1074a80d3b65ff4a924d98f6d4cbd31086a97dd4138 Plugin Version: 0.1.0-dev120-TEXT-DOOR-CLOSE-AUTHORITY-RECONCILIATION そしてこっちは中身が、 DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md あり kpdfCloseTextDoor() あり DEFERRED-QA.md なし なので、さっきの f74f... は後からQA用の機材が付いた枝だったと見てよさそう。 しかも 76cdab... はこっちで把握していたDEV120正規側SHAとも一致してる。 したがって並列班へ渡すのは今ぺったんした方でOK★ さっきのDEFERRED-QA版は今回の比較対象から外そう。 > 🕊️ DEV120差し替えです。 先ほどのDEFERRED-QA版は今回の比較対象から撤回。 今回はこちらを使用してください。 SHA256: 76cdab7a4446f8db77adb1074a80d3b65ff4a924d98f6d4cbd31086a97dd4138 DEV117-V2とのREAD ONLY比較を続行。 施工・修理・再設計なし。 これで鳩飛ばしてよしー★ 🕊️💨 表示を増やす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev124-SERIAL-TOKEN-DECIDE-ISSUE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev125-SYSTEM-TOKEN-COMMON-MAIN-POWER-GATE.zip Zip アーカイブ これでいいー？ 消せたぁああ！ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 計測器があとからきたーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ あ、ジャンプした…（笑） 9月13日(日) 14:15 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev166-PAPER-AXIS-LOCKED-PAIR-CONVERSION(1).zip Zip アーカイブ おしごときたよー🕊️ 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — DEV166 SAVED RECORD → PRESENTATION MATRIX AUDIT READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO REDESIGN. COMMON PARENT Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev166-PAPER-AXIS-LOCKED-PAIR-CONVERSION.zip DEV166 is RUNTIME KNOWN-PASS. ================================================== HUMAN ARCHITECTURE ================================================== Output authority is the SAVED RECORD / SAVED DESIGN. Do NOT assume FINAL or JPG should copy/screenshot Browser Preview. Human model: edit → SAVE → saved record → reconstruct each output Preview may be a presentation reference. Preview is NOT the persistent output authority. ================================================== AUDIT THESE OUTPUTS IN PARALLEL ================================================== 1. Sample Mask 2. development / test PDF 3. production / site Preview 4. production PDF 5. JPG / SNS ================================================== AUDIT THESE PRESENTATION FAMILIES ================================================== - Ordinary Text - general System Token - Serial - publication permission text - System by Kaia ================================================== FOR EACH FAMILY / OUTPUT, IDENTIFY ================================================== - source authority - what is saved - exact save field/path - what survives load - presentation settings available from saved record - color - size - position - rotation - font - decoration/style - enabled / connected state - token identity / definition where relevant - which output currently consumes it - mannequin / real-value responsibility - missing connection, if any ================================================== HUMAN OUTPUT MATRIX — CURRENT TRUTH ================================================== SAMPLE MASK - Ordinary Text: YES - general System Token: mannequin - Serial: NO - publication permission: NO - System by Kaia: YES DEVELOPMENT / TEST PDF - Ordinary Text: YES - general System Token: mannequin - Serial: mannequin XXXX-XXXX - publication permission: NO - System by Kaia: YES PRODUCTION / SITE PREVIEW - Ordinary Text: YES - general System Token: REAL value - Serial: NO - publication permission: NO - System by Kaia: YES PRODUCTION PDF - Ordinary Text: YES - general System Token: REAL value - Serial: REAL Serial - publication permission: NO - System by Kaia: YES JPG / SNS Human result requirement: production Preview-equivalent presentation + publication permission Therefore: - Ordinary Text: YES - general System Token: REAL value - Serial: NO - publication permission: YES - System by Kaia: YES JPG generation method is NOT Human-specified. Do NOT assume DOM screenshot. If saved-record reconstruction is simpler / safer, report that. ================================================== PUBLICATION PERMISSION ================================================== Human operation is a single dropdown. One language selected from the fixed supported language set. Conceptually: publication language ▼ Only the selected language needs to be retained as Human state. Publication text appears in JPG only. Do NOT force publication permission into PDF. ================================================== SYSTEM BY KAIA ================================================== Treat as fixed product furniture / fixed text. Human does not require it to become editable Text authority. Determine current SOURCE authority and whether it needs to be stored per record at all, or can be reconstructed from fixed product authority. Do NOT invent duplicate persistence. ================================================== EXISTING INVESTIGATION WITNESS ================================================== Previous investigation found: - text_objects survive to FINAL path - token_symbols survive to FINAL path - FINAL PDF renderer currently has no Text presentation stage Verify this. Do NOT reopen persistence redesign unless SOURCE contradicts it. ================================================== REPORT ================================================== Return a matrix showing for every family/output: 1. saved authority 2. restore authority 3. presentation authority 4. mannequin / real / none 5. current connection status 6. missing connection if any 7. whether saved record is sufficient 8. any information genuinely missing from saved record 9. smallest SOURCE-supported output architecture 10. STOP / WATCH CONSTRUCTION: NONE. HUMAN SHORTHAND 「保存した記録紙から組み直せ★ Previewを保存物扱いするな★ 出力先ごとに、載せる物だけ載せろ★」 表示を減らす 9月14日(月) 0:55 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev173-TOKEN-FONT-ALL-UNDERLINE-CONTROL(1).zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — CUT2 LEGACY MOVE HANDLE WIRING / HISTORY / RETIREMENT DEPENDENCY AUDIT ROLE: INVESTIGATION SEAT 2 PARALLEL COMPARISON / DEPENDENCY AUDITOR READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO RETIREMENT EXECUTION. NO PRODUCT REDESIGN. ================================================== BACKGROUND ================================================== Kaia PDF FREE CUT2 is redesigning the Human Text operation flow. Human interaction model: Text click → selected / stationary waiting state → Human explicitly chooses MOVE or INPUT. MOVE: - visible presentation remains the layout witness; - System Tokens remain represented by their mannequin presentation; - the Human-visible Text box itself becomes the MOVE operation surface; - MOVE and 45-degree Text rotation are available. INPUT: - RAW Text becomes editable; - MOVE and rotation are unavailable. Because MOVE will use the Human-visible Text box itself, the existing separate legacy Move Handles are intended to retire. However: HUMAN DECISION THAT THE HANDLES SHOULD EVENTUALLY RETIRE DOES NOT AUTHORIZE IMMEDIATE SOURCE REMOVAL. The handles may currently carry wiring or accident-prevention behavior that must survive even if the physical handle furniture disappears. ================================================== PRIMARY SAFETY PRINCIPLE ================================================== Do NOT treat the Move Handles as visual furniture only. Before retirement, establish exactly what they currently own, trigger, guard, suppress, share, or route. Human concern: "突然ハンドルを解雇したら事故るかもしれない。 先に配線を調べる。" This audit exists specifically to prevent: remove old furniture → unknowingly remove useful wiring → mobile / selection / gesture / MOVE regression. ================================================== ARTIFACT ================================================== Primary SOURCE witness expected: Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev173-TOKEN-FONT-ALL-UNDERLINE-CONTROL.zip Known SHA256: 382a738c022d96dfa14acdafe5d672dd11fe2319b8bc893e58112216da5c6c6f Verify the actual artifact before relying on it. DEV173 is the current Text blueprint SOURCE witness. Do NOT assume that historical behavior can be inferred from DEV173 alone when development history provides relevant evidence. ================================================== IMPORTANT — CHECK DEVELOPMENT HISTORY FIRST ================================================== This product maintains development/update history. For old or unusual wiring, the Workshop rule is: OLD / STRANGE WIRING → CHECK DEVELOPMENT HISTORY → THEN INTERPRET CURRENT SOURCE. Before deciding that any handle-related code is obsolete, search the available DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY / update-history evidence for the handle, Text MOVE, mobile movement, pointer handling, gesture prevention, selection, direct editing, or closely related changes. Determine where evidence permits: - when the relevant mechanism appeared; - why it was introduced; - what bug/regression it prevented; - whether it replaced an older mechanism; - whether later revisions partially superseded it; - whether previous removal/change caused a regression; - whether it was ever established as known-good runtime behavior. History is historical evidence, NOT runtime authority. Do not allow historical documentation to override exact current SOURCE. But do not cut unexplained old wiring before checking why it exists. ================================================== YOUR ONLY JOB ================================================== Audit ALL relevant dependencies of the legacy Text Move Handles so a later construction seat can retire the furniture safely. Do NOT design the replacement MOVE architecture. Do NOT implement retirement. Do NOT modify DEV173. Answer: "What would be affected if the legacy Move Handles disappeared?" ================================================== IDENTIFY THE HANDLE FURNITURE ================================================== Locate the exact legacy Text Move Handle implementation. Expected known classes from the current Text blueprint include: .kpdf-drag-handle .kpdf-drag-handle.is-left .kpdf-drag-handle.is-right Verify rather than assume. Identify: - DOM creation; - insertion/removal; - CSS; - visibility conditions; - desktop/mobile conditions; - selection conditions; - pointer/event attachment; - cleanup paths; - any data attributes/state; - all direct callers and consumers. ================================================== PARALLEL WIRING AUDIT ================================================== Audit these categories independently. A. MOVE ENTRY WIRING Determine exactly how a handle starts movement. Trace through: handle → pointer/mouse/touch event → movement entry → kpdfBeginTextMove() or equivalent → movement session → finish/cancel → textChanged() → syncTextPaper() if applicable. Identify which pieces belong specifically to the handle and which belong to the reusable Text movement engine. B. POINTER LIFECYCLE Trace: pointerdown pointermove pointerup pointercancel and any: setPointerCapture releasePointerCapture document/window listeners temporary listeners cleanup callbacks. Determine whether removing the handle DOM without transferring any of these responsibilities would strand or break a movement session. C. MOBILE / DESKTOP SPLIT The current Text blueprint reports: desktop: Text object mousedown movement entry mobile: left/right Move Handle pointer lifecycle Verify the exact current SOURCE. Determine: - what is truly mobile-only; - what is desktop-only; - what is shared; - whether handle retirement would remove the only mobile MOVE entry; - whether any desktop behavior references the same classes/functions. D. STAGE GESTURE / PAN / PINCH PROTECTION Audit whether the Move Handles participate in preventing conflicts with: - stage pan; - pinch/zoom; - touch scrolling; - browser default gestures; - propagation to parent operation surfaces; - accidental selection changes. Check relevant: preventDefault() stopPropagation() touch-action pointer capture gesture flags stage guards only where SOURCE connects them to handle operation. Do not redesign gesture handling. Report dependencies only. E. TEXT SELECTION Determine whether handle interaction: - selects the Text object; - preserves existing selection; - changes selected layer; - prevents selection clearing; - closes/opens Text operation state; - interacts with outside-click logic. A future handle retirement must not accidentally change selection semantics. F. DIRECT EDIT / CONTENTEDITABLE PROTECTION Determine whether handle wiring currently prevents MOVE from becoming Text editing, or vice versa. Audit relevant conditions involving: .kpdf-text-content contenteditable focus blur direct-edit state mobile text lock Report whether any guard currently attached to the handle must survive when MOVE becomes a distinct Human-selected mode. G. PRESENTATION VISIBILITY Determine whether handle movement currently causes or depends on: RAW Text visibility .kpdf-system-presentation visibility kpdfRefreshPresentation() kpdfApplyMobileTextLock() or equivalent. This is especially important because CUT2 intends MOVE to preserve the visible mannequin presentation. Do not redesign it. Just identify current coupling. H. ROTATION COUPLING Determine whether Move Handles currently know anything about Text rotation, rotation controls, dataset.rotation, or visual rotation. If there is no coupling, explicitly report NONE. Do not infer one. I. CSS / LAYOUT SIDE EFFECTS Identify whether handle CSS contributes anything beyond the visible handle itself, including: - object dimensions; - padding; - overflow; - pointer-events; - stacking; - z-index; - touch-action; - hit area; - positioning. A visually retired handle must not accidentally change Text geometry if its CSS currently participates in layout. J. SHARED / ORPHAN RISK Search all handle-related selectors, helper names, and event paths. Classify what would become: - orphan caller; - orphan callee; - dead CSS; - dead DOM creation; - unreachable cleanup; - stale mobile branch; - stale comments/history assumptions; if the furniture were simply deleted. ================================================== CLASSIFICATION ================================================== For every relevant mechanism found, classify it as one of: A. HANDLE-ONLY FURNITURE Safe retirement candidate after replacement MOVE is runtime-proven. B. REUSABLE MOVE MACHINERY Not owned by the handle; replacement MOVE should be able to enter/reuse it or its preserved equivalent. C. SAFETY / GESTURE / SELECTION WIRING Must not be silently deleted with the furniture. D. SHARED WITH OTHER FUNCTIONALITY Outside narrow handle ownership. Do not touch without separate evidence. E. HISTORICAL / LEGACY VALUE ONLY No longer needed in active runtime, but technically useful as reference. F. UNKNOWN / AMBIGUOUS STOP boundary requiring Human or additional SOURCE evidence. ================================================== WAREHOUSE RULE ================================================== Human Workshop rule: THE ACTIVE WORKSITE SHOULD BE CLEAN. Do NOT recommend leaving obsolete runtime code in the active plugin merely because it is technically interesting. If retired handle machinery contains useful historical or technical knowledge: "もったいねー…" classify it for separate WAREHOUSE / LEGACY REFERENCE preservation. Warehouse material is: - separate documentation/reference; - NON-AUTHORITATIVE; - NON-RUNTIME; - NON-CURRENT-SPEC; - not a reason to keep dead active code; - not allowed to silently return to current implementation. Report WHAT is worth preserving and WHY. Do NOT create the warehouse document during this READ ONLY audit unless separately ordered. ================================================== RETIREMENT ORDER — DO NOT EXECUTE ================================================== The intended later safety sequence is: 1. understand existing handle wiring; 2. establish replacement visible-box MOVE entry; 3. preserve/transfer only necessary shared or safety behavior; 4. runtime-prove replacement MOVE; 5. only then retire legacy handle furniture; 6. audit resulting SOURCE for orphan/dead remnants; 7. archive worthwhile retired technical knowledge separately; 8. leave active worksite clean. This sequence is context only. YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE ANY STEP. ================================================== DO NOT REOPEN ================================================== Do NOT redesign: - RAW Text authority; - visible presentation authority; - Token mannequin; - Token Font / Style / Underline / Size; - saved x/y; - saved rotation; - 45-degree rotation increment; - NEUTRAL / MOVE / INPUT Human model; - clipping policy; - paper-axis architecture; - Position Return; - Common Main Power. Do not investigate unrelated product machinery. ================================================== LATEST ARTIFACT BOUNDARY ================================================== If DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY or DEV173 SOURCE establishes that handle behavior was materially changed after DEV173, and safe retirement analysis therefore requires the latest runtime artifact: STOP. Request that artifact from Shamyue. Do not infer across the unknown diff. ================================================== STOP RULE ================================================== Any: 「あれ？」 「うわぁ……」 means immediate STOP. Examples include: - a handle unexpectedly owns unrelated product authority; - a supposedly handle-only path is shared with another major subsystem; - history contradicts current assumptions; - current SOURCE and history cannot be reconciled safely; - retirement appears to require redesign outside CUT2; - required evidence is missing. STOP at the observed boundary. Do NOT continue diagnosing. Do NOT repair. Do NOT propose a workaround. Do NOT remove anything. Return the exact observation to Shamyue / Aide. ================================================== RETURN ================================================== Return a parallel dependency report containing: 1. Artifact/hash verification 2. Development-history evidence 3. Exact handle DOM/CSS inventory 4. MOVE entry wiring 5. Pointer lifecycle wiring 6. Mobile / desktop split 7. Stage pan/pinch/gesture dependencies 8. Selection dependencies 9. Direct-edit/contenteditable dependencies 10. Presentation visibility dependencies 11. Rotation dependencies 12. CSS/layout side effects 13. Shared caller/callee dependencies 14. Orphan/dead-code risk 15. Classification A–F for each meaningful mechanism 16. Warehouse candidates, if any 17. What MUST survive handle retirement 18. What appears safe to retire AFTER replacement runtime proof 19. Latest-artifact requirement, if any 20. WATCH / STOP findings Finish with exactly one disposition: RESULT: A. RETIREMENT PATH CLEAR — DEPENDENCIES IDENTIFIED B. RETIREMENT PATH CONDITIONALLY CLEAR — SPECIFIC EVIDENCE REQUIRED C. STOP — SHARED/UNKNOWN WIRING PREVENTS SAFE RETIREMENT PLAN D. STOP — LATEST ARTIFACT REQUIRED ================================================== AUTHORITY ================================================== AUDIT ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO HANDLE REMOVAL. NO CHILD BUILD. NO PRODUCT DECISION. The Human has decided the legacy Move Handles are intended to retire. This audit determines how that retirement can later occur without cutting useful wiring. DEV173 must remain unchanged. 表示を減らす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev173-TOKEN-FONT-ALL-UNDERLINE-CONTROL-REPACK-IDENTITY-RECONCILED.zip Zip アーカイブ 封入わすれてたって（笑） 貰ってきた 9月16日(水) 0:45 Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev5-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev7-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ ありがとーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 並列検査のお願いだよー うい！並列検査ありがたい★ ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ こっちから頼みたいのは、施工班が自分で検査すると甘くなりやすいところを優先してこのへん！ 1. 親→子の差分監査 各5 ZIPについて、親からの変更が「Actual Value Board sibling＋Producer配線＋履歴」だけか。 既存製品authority、Routing、Common既存機能、UI等への意図外変更がないか。 特に各製品で版差のある kaia-common-routing.php を壊していないか。 2. Producer発火境界の独立監査 Counter：成功したHuman GET NUMBERだけで counter が書かれる。 Timestamp Free：page acquisitionだけで timestamp.page。 Timestamp Standard：page acquisitionで timestamp.page、④ Human radio選択だけで timestamp.decided。 Standardの RECORD CURRENT TIME / ③ DECIDE / pending / cancelでは timestamp.decided が書かれないこと。 Serial：成功したHuman ISSUE SERIALだけで serial。 failure/candidate/pendingから付箋が漏れないこと。 3. 住所と値のauthority監査 binder_ref / refill_ref がProducer既存authority由来で、Boardが A-01 等を勝手に決定していない。 Counterの値を再採番・再formatしていない。 TimestampをBoard側で加工していない。 Serialを再生成していない。 4. Board単体の寿命・故障境界 recordが本当に binder_ref / refill_ref / name / value / written_at のみ。 expires_at なし。 <12h は返る、>=12h は返らない。 expiry時に物理削除しない。 Board書込み失敗がProducerの正式決定をrollback/retry/reissueさせない。 あと実機までやれる班がいるなら、一番欲しいのは統合Runtime QA。 A-01 Counter発行 → counter付箋あり A-02 Counter発行 → A-01と混線せずA-02に付く Timestamp Free表示 → timestamp.pageあり Timestamp Standard → pageあり → RECORDだけ：decidedなし → DECIDEだけ：decidedなし → radio Human選択：decidedあり Serial発行 → serialあり Reload → 12h以内の付箋保持 期限境界をテスト可能なら 11:59:59 → readable 12:00:00 → unreadable かつrecord自体は残存 特に Timestamp Standardの「③では貼らない、④で貼る」 と、A-01/A-02の混線なしを第三者に殴ってもらえるとかなり嬉しい★🤣 もしどこかで「あれ？」が出たら、原因探索や修理まで行かず、その地点でSTOPして現物だけ持って帰ってきてもらってー！ 🕊️🔬 表示を増やす Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ うい！🕊️📦 向こうに「返答＋差し替え実機」をそのまま一緒に持っていける形にするね。 向こうにはこれを貼って、下のZIPを添付すればOK★ > 🕊️ PARALLEL QA — PARENT CORRECTION / REPLACEMENT ARTIFACT 前回のSTOPを受け、Timestamp Standard の親identityを再確認しました。 Counter Freeについて 今回の直親は Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev6-KAI43-BROWSER-DECIDED-STATE-READOUT.zip です。 過去記録からも、このdev6 KAI43が今回以前の実機として確認されています。 したがって、旧Operational dev2 → dev7 を今回施工差分として扱わず、dev6 → dev7 を直親比較境界として再監査してください。 Counter Standard / Timestamp Free / Serial Standardについても、今回使用した親と過去の実機記録の系譜は整合しています。 --- 🔴 Timestamp Standardのみ親選定に誤りがあり、修正しました。 当初Board Producer施工に使用した親： Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev4-COLLISION-OFF-SIMPLIFICATION.zip SHA256: 884f13ad5415e84d9ea4dc86108f149c7885ab2809c7b3abbefbacd2ebd1a051 これは正規系譜上の実物でしたが、一世代古い親でした。 正しい親： Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev5-COLLISION-DIALOG-DISABLED-DECIDE.zip SHA256: 4c688947cd1a514c9c9a7b841756ce49419776ab08c4930bcbd1faa96a319c01 正規dev5の DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY からも、上記dev4 → dev5の系譜を確認済みです。 dev4由来の旧 Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev5-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER は後継として採用しません。 正規dev5を親としてBoard Producer差分のみ再施工し、新しい子を作成しました。 NEW CHILD / QA TARGET Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip SHA256: 378afffc9db402b338c04e33d0e822c2814648d1146c9763ca1a5f4b9e0f82a1 施工側確認： Version Header → dev6 internal VERSION → dev6 正規dev5 Collision Dialog behavior → preserved kaia-common-routing.php → parent byte-preserved Actual Value Board sibling → added timestamp.page producer → added timestamp.decided → Human radio selection boundary only RECORD CURRENT TIME → no timestamp.decided record-storage [DECIDE] → no timestamp.decided DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md → exactly one PHP lint → PASS ZIP integrity → PASS お願いしたいQA Timestamp Standardについては、旧Board dev5ではなく、添付の新dev6を正規dev5と比較してください。 他4機についてもそれぞれ正しい直親→Board Producer子の境界で監査を再開してください。 特に確認希望： 1. parent → child narrow diff 2. Existing product / Collision / Common Routing behavior preservation 3. Board producer firing boundaries 4. Product-owned binder/refill address authority 5. Board value authority 6. TTL <12h readable / >=12h null / physical record remains 7. Board failureがproducer decisionをrollback/retry/reissueしないこと 8. Runtime可能ならA-01/A-02 cross-wire、reload、Timestamp Standardの page / decided 境界 STOP RULE 新しい差異・不明な親境界・予期しない挙動を発見した場合、原因探索・修理・施工を行わず、その地点でSTOPして報告してください。 NO REPAIR. NO REDESIGN. NO PRODUCT DECISION. これなら向こうも、「なんでTimestamp Standardだけ番号変わった？」まで経緯込みで追えるはず★ 添付する実機はこれ一本でOK。旧Timestamp Standard Board dev5は渡さなくていい。 🕊️ QA差し替え実機 — Timestamp Standard dev6 ACTUAL VALUE BOARD PRODUCER 表示を増やす Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev5-KAI43-BROWSER-DECIDED-STATE-READOUT.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev6-KAI43-BROWSER-DECIDED-STATE-READOUT.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev5-COLLISION-DIALOG-DISABLED-DECIDE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev4-COLLISION-OFF-SIMPLIFICATION(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev5-SERIAL-LOGO-ALIGNMENT.zip Zip アーカイブ 親もいるのか 多分この中に入ってるとおもうー（笑） 差異あればおしえて Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev5-COLLISION-DIALOG-DISABLED-DECIDE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Standard-v1.1.8-dev6-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ スマホだと名前全部みえないんだよねえ… これでどお？ うーん？なんかタイムスタンプおかしいな… うん、スタンダードは未完であってた ただ、配管系は先に刺さないと沼ると思って作業ラインに入れてた可能性がたかい。 フリーは完成させてるんだ。 フリーでやったらとれた（笑） 9月16日(水) 3:52 Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev7-READY-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev7-READY-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev7-READY-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev8-READY-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ 追加ー🕊️ うい！ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 並列検査班へそのまま鳩できる検査票にするー★ 今回は「READY WITNESSだけ施工した」を証明する検査。PDFはまだ呼ばない。 🕊️ KAIA ACTUAL VALUE BOARD — READY WITNESS PARALLEL INDEPENDENT INSPECTION ORDER ROLE: INDEPENDENT INSPECTION SEAT MODE: READ ONLY NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO REDESIGN. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO NEW CHILD ZIP. --- TARGET ARTIFACTS 1. Counter Free Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev8-READY-WITNESS.zip EXPECTED SHA256: 48b073f2d49e1fc21ee3f700cd6abd613c0bccd0b50275aa155b0897042474bb 2. Counter Standard Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev7-READY-WITNESS.zip EXPECTED SHA256: f54e814b0ffeaec4687a9462f59a7419e7185f4af1f6b6a0ddb8d3475475c011 3. Timestamp Free Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev7-READY-WITNESS.zip EXPECTED SHA256: abea509d1b7e911e6b17ec956791ea37bda7d462b51c7c73841993ab9ea663d7 4. Serial Standard Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev7-READY-WITNESS.zip EXPECTED SHA256: 516b4d37be82854d01377a4b39613e22723fe1b703b4f0c3d79f54853ea7d2db Explicit non-target Timestamp Standard READY-WITNESS CONSTRUCTION HOLD DO NOT INSPECT AS A READY-WITNESS CHILD. --- PART A — EXACT ARTIFACT IDENTITY For every target: [ ] Exact filename matches [ ] Exact SHA256 matches [ ] ZIP integrity PASS [ ] Plugin identity/version matches child identity [ ] Exactly one DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md exists at plugin root Any mismatch: STOP that artifact immediately. Do not substitute a nearby artifact. --- PART B — NARROW DIFF / SCOPE AUDIT Compare each child against its exact direct parent. Confirm that READY-WITNESS construction did NOT become a broader product change. Expected conceptual changes only: 1. child/version identity 2. Actual Value Board record SET behavior: ready:true added 3. DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md Check: [ ] No unrelated product behavior change [ ] No UI redesign [ ] No new Human control [ ] No new issuance/acquisition path [ ] No Producer SET relocation [ ] No PDF work [ ] No Token/renderer work If unrelated functional changes appear: STOP. --- PART C — BOARD STORAGE CONTRACT Inspect the Actual Value Board implementation. Existing storage identity must remain: kaia_common_actual_value_board_v1 Existing record identity must remain based on: binder_ref refill_ref name A newly normal-SET record must now contain: binder_ref refill_ref name value written_at ready: true Confirm: [ ] ready:true is stored on normal SET [ ] ready is NOT an input argument to SET [ ] ready:false state was NOT introduced [ ] SET signature remains otherwise compatible [ ] value is not modified to carry ready internally Critical authority check: > ready:true must be a mechanical consequence of an authorized Producer calling the existing normal SET path. The Board must NOT inspect the product/value and decide readiness itself. --- PART D — NO BOARD INTELLIGENCE Search specifically for accidental readiness inference. FAIL if Board does anything equivalent to: if value exists → ready if name == counter → ready if name == serial → ready if timestamp looks valid → ready if product state says X → ready Expected: Producer calls normal SET ↓ Board stores record ↓ ready:true Nothing smarter. --- PART E — WRITTEN_AT / TTL REGRESSION Confirm existing time contract is unchanged. Expected: fresh record → readable elapsed < 12h → readable elapsed >= 12h → unavailable Check: [ ] written_at still originates from normal SET [ ] ready does not refresh TTL independently [ ] ready does not extend TTL [ ] expired record is not physically deleted merely by GET [ ] no timer [ ] no cron [ ] no cleanup If practical, run boundary simulation for: 11:59:59.999 → readable 12:00:00.000 → unavailable --- PART F — OLD RECORD BEHAVIOR Model or inspect a legacy record with no ready field. Expected: old record value = present ready = absent It must NOT be automatically rewritten merely by: page load GET plugin initialization Check: [ ] No migration [ ] No startup upgrade [ ] No ready auto-promotion [ ] No compatibility repair The next legitimate Producer SET may naturally overwrite it with a new ready:true record. --- PART G — PRODUCER AUTHORITY / SET LOCATION This is important. Verify the child did not move the existing Board SET call merely to obtain READY status. Counter Free Expected existing authority boundary: successful existing Counter actual-value establishment ↓ Board SET Check: [ ] Existing successful establishment boundary preserved [ ] ready does not appear before actual value establishment Counter Standard Same check. Serial Standard Expected: successful existing Serial issuance ↓ Board SET Check: [ ] Existing issuance boundary preserved [ ] no pre-issuance ready witness Timestamp Free Expected: existing first automatic acquisition establishment ↓ timestamp.page Board SET ↓ ready:true Check carefully: [ ] No new Human DECIDE button [ ] No second Timestamp acquisition [ ] No reformatting [ ] Existing automatic acquisition boundary preserved [ ] Existing timestamp.page representation preserved If any existing SET location differs materially from this expected authority boundary: STOP that artifact. Do not repair or reinterpret it. --- PART H — TIMESTAMP STANDARD ISOLATION Confirm this READY-WITNESS construction did not silently drag Timestamp Standard into scope. Expected: Timestamp Standard existing Board plumbing → untouched by this construction Timestamp Standard ready witness → NONE Current Standard DECIDE → NOT newly declared usable-Timestamp final decision Specifically search for evidence that this construction introduced a Standard: timestamp.decided + ready:true If yes: FAIL / STOP. --- PART I — COMMON ROUTING PRESERVATION Check Common Routing against each exact parent. Expected: Routing authority UNCHANGED Prefer byte comparison where applicable. Check: [ ] OPTION_WIRINGS unchanged [ ] seat/address semantics unchanged [ ] no new member registry [ ] no Board-side routing [ ] no ID → A-xx reconstruction --- PART J — BOARD FAILURE PRINCIPLE Static inspection should confirm READY-WITNESS construction did not add: Board write failed ↓ rollback Product There must be no new: reissue reacquisition re-decision retry loop fallback actual value introduced for Board failure. --- PART K — STATIC HEALTH For every target: [ ] PHP lint PASS [ ] No syntax error [ ] No duplicate DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md [ ] No unexpected packaged junk [ ] ZIP integrity PASS --- PART L — RUNTIME QA After static inspection PASS, runtime test each safe Producer independently. Counter Free / Standard Perform the existing legitimate Human establishment action. Then inspect the physical Board record. Expected: name = counter value = existing actual value written_at = present ready = true Serial Standard Perform normal existing issuance. Expected: name = serial value = issued Serial written_at = present ready = true Timestamp Free Allow the normal automatic acquisition to occur. Expected: name = timestamp.page value = existing Timestamp representation written_at = present ready = true No extra Human action should be necessary for Timestamp Free. --- PART M — COEXISTENCE REGRESSION Where practical, confirm multiple normal Board notes still coexist. Example: A-01 / counter / ready:true A-01 / timestamp.page / ready:true A-01 / serial / ready:true One SET must not erase unrelated notes. Same-name normal overwrite behavior should remain unchanged. --- PART N — EXPLICITLY DO NOT TEST AS IMPLEMENTED These are future PDF work, not acceptance requirements for these four children: PDF roll call PDF missing-member STOP gate Timestamp decided > page consumption PDF POST carrier PHP actual-value reception Token placement renderer final PDF drawing Do not FAIL these Producer children because those functions are absent. --- STOP RULE At the first: 「あれ？」 「うわぁ……」 unexpected diff authority ambiguity identity mismatch unexpected Standard involvement STOP at that point. Report the exact observation. Do NOT: investigate beyond the STOP boundary repair modify source make a replacement ZIP redesign --- REQUIRED REPORT FORMAT 🕊️ READY WITNESS — INDEPENDENT QA REPORT ARTIFACT IDENTITY Counter Free PASS / FAIL Counter Standard PASS / FAIL Timestamp Free PASS / FAIL Serial Standard PASS / FAIL STATIC CONTRACT ready:true on authorized SET PASS / FAIL ready argument absent PASS / FAIL Board product judgment absent PASS / FAIL Storage identity preserved PASS / FAIL Record identity preserved PASS / FAIL written_at preserved PASS / FAIL 12h boundary preserved PASS / FAIL Old-record auto-promotion absent PASS / FAIL Migration/cleanup absent PASS / FAIL PRODUCER AUTHORITY Counter Free boundary PASS / FAIL Counter Standard boundary PASS / FAIL Timestamp Free boundary PASS / FAIL Serial Standard boundary PASS / FAIL ISOLATION Timestamp Standard ready absent PASS / FAIL Common Routing unchanged PASS / FAIL PDF unchanged/out of scope PASS / FAIL Token/Renderer untouched PASS / FAIL RUNTIME Counter Free PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Counter Standard PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Timestamp Free PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Serial Standard PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Legacy record non-promotion PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Coexistence PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN STOP / WATCH [exact observation, if any] FINAL PASS PASS WITH WATCH FAIL STOP 一言でいうと検査班のお仕事は、 > 「ready:true が増えただけなのに、誰か余計な知恵まで生えてないか見てこい★」 ですｗｗｗ🤣 これなら静的班と実機班を並列で投げられるよーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 表示を減らす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev218-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-RECEIVER-POST-CARRIER.zip Zip アーカイブ よろー🕊️ うい！🕊️ヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ さっきREADY-WITNESSを静的検査してくれた並列班へ、そのまま投げられるDEV218検査票にする★ 今回はかなり重要なので、「Boardを読めた」だけじゃなく、“PDFが余計な知恵を持ってない”まで検査対象に入れる。 --- 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — DEV218 ACTUAL VALUE BOARD RECEIVER / POST CARRIER INDEPENDENT PARALLEL INSPECTION ORDER ROLE: INDEPENDENT INSPECTION SEAT MODE: READ ONLY If any anomaly, authority ambiguity, unexpected behavior, or materially different architecture is found: STOP immediately and report the exact observation. Do not investigate past the STOP boundary. --- TARGET Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev218-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-RECEIVER-POST-CARRIER.zip EXPECTED SHA256: 8c0bd0e92111540ae9833de2778f62964c6321144d9d2b42582e8d7237b983d5 Exact direct parent Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev217-PREVIEW-FIXED-VISUAL-MANNEQUIN-VISIBLE.zip EXPECTED SHA256: a7c2bd0516e1c37a7cbe9878391c882181646f71a01233f01715ceb4047ae899 First verify exact artifact identity. If either identity differs: STOP. --- 1 — ARTIFACT / PACKAGE IDENTITY Check: [ ] Target filename exact [ ] Target SHA256 exact [ ] Direct parent identity exact [ ] ZIP integrity PASS [ ] Plugin Header child identity correct [ ] Internal VERSION child identity correct [ ] Exactly one root DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md [ ] PHP lint PASS Report any unexpected newer lineage rather than substituting it. --- 2 — PARENT → CHILD NARROW DIFF Compare DEV218 against exact DEV217. Determine every changed file and every functional change. Expected DEV218 scope is ONLY: Board READ-ONLY receiver ↓ required-value roll call ↓ Issue POST carrier ↓ PHP generate_request() reception / validation boundary ↓ STOP Plus normal child identity/history changes. Explicitly confirm DEV218 did NOT introduce: Token injection renderer consumption PDF drawing JPG drawing actual-value formatting redesign Producer changes Actual Value Board SET Actual Value Board DELETE Board cleanup Board migration Common Routing redesign new Human controls Unexpected functional diff => STOP. --- 3 — BOARD STORAGE AUTHORITY DEV218 must read the already-established browser storage contract. Expected storage identity: kaia_common_actual_value_board_v1 Expected physical record identity: binder_ref refill_ref name Expected record metadata relevant to acceptance: value written_at ready === true Check that PDF does not create a second Board schema or alternative storage authority. Expected: Board = existing authority/storage contract PDF = consumer only --- 4 — STRICT READ-ONLY READER Search the DEV218 PDF reader thoroughly. It must NOT perform: SET DELETE localStorage.setItem() localStorage.removeItem() record rewrite ready promotion written_at refresh migration cleanup schema normalization write-back Reading/parsing is allowed. Check especially that a legacy record: value = present ready = absent is rejected as READY but remains physically untouched. Expected: Reader sees old record ↓ not ready ↓ unavailable for Issue ↓ NO mutation --- 5 — ROUTING → BOARD ADDRESS CONTRACT This is a high-priority inspection. DEV218 must derive the required Board addresses from existing Common Routing membership. Expected conceptual path: PDF current refill ↓ Common Routing ↓ member binder_ref / refill_ref ↓ Board record lookup The reader must use the Routing member's direct: binder_ref refill_ref Check that DEV218 does NOT: convert member to runtime ID then reconstruct A-xx guess A-01 hard-code refill IDs query Producer state to rediscover address create Board-side routing Common Routing authority must remain authoritative and unchanged. Prefer byte-comparison of existing Common Routing implementation against DEV217. --- 6 — REQUIRED PRODUCT ROLL CALL Inspect exactly which linked products DEV218 requires. Expected product names: counter serial timestamp.page timestamp.decided But Timestamp is one logical required member with priority selection, not two simultaneously required values. Expected logical complete set: Counter actual value + Timestamp selected candidate + Serial actual value subject to what products are actually linked by Routing. DEV218 must NOT invent a fixed universal requirement independent of Routing. In particular: unlinked product → must not become required merely because PDF knows its name If DEV218 hard-codes “Counter + Timestamp + Serial always required” regardless of Routing: STOP. --- 7 — READY CONTRACT A Board record is eligible only when: ready === true Check strict boolean semantics. These must NOT count as ready: ready absent ready false ready "true" ready 1 value merely present API GET merely readable PDF must not infer readiness from product/name/value/state. Expected: physical record + ready === true + fresh written_at → eligible --- 8 — 12-HOUR CONTRACT DEV218 must independently respect the existing Board 12h lifetime. Expected boundary: elapsed < 12h → eligible elapsed >= 12h → unavailable Check exact boundary if practical: 11:59:59.999 → eligible 12:00:00.000 → unavailable Confirm DEV218 does NOT: refresh written_at extend TTL because ready=true delete expired record fallback to stale value --- 9 — TIMESTAMP PRIORITY This is another high-priority inspection. Expected rule: if timestamp.decided is valid + ready + fresh use timestamp.decided else if timestamp.page is valid + ready + fresh use timestamp.page else Timestamp unavailable If timestamp.decided wins, POST only: "timestamp.decided": value Do NOT also POST timestamp.page. If page fallback wins, POST only: "timestamp.page": value Do NOT rename either one to generic: timestamp Original Board note identity must survive the carrier boundary. Also confirm DEV218 does not interpret current unfinished Timestamp Standard product behavior as a new final decision authority. --- 10 — VALUE PRESERVATION DEV218 is a carrier, not a formatter. Check that: counter value serial value timestamp representation object cross the browser carrier without DEV218 redesigning their contents. No: Counter reformat Leading Zero recalculation Serial regeneration Timestamp reformat Timestamp epoch recalculation timezone replacement value schema normalization The value established by Producer must remain the value carried. --- 11 — ADMIN / PUBLIC READER UNITY DEV217 has two Issue entry paths: Admin editor dynamic FINAL Public shortcode FINAL DEV218 must use the same conceptual Board Reader contract for both. Check: [ ] Admin does not depend on window.KaiaActualValueBoard existing [ ] Public does not use a separate authority [ ] Both read the same storage key/schema [ ] Both apply the same ready/TTL/address/Timestamp rules This is especially important because the Producer Board furniture itself historically prints only on public wp_head. DEV218 must not require that global Board JS object in Admin. Expected: PDF Reader → reads storage contract directly --- 12 — MISSING REQUIRED VALUE = PRE-POST STOP Inspect both Issue paths. If any Routing-required actual value is unavailable because of: missing physical record ready absent/not true expired record invalid record shape required by reader missing required Routing address expected behavior: Issue attempt ↓ browser roll call FAIL ↓ Issue POST NOT SENT DEV218 must NOT: ask Producer for a replacement issue a new Counter issue a new Serial acquire a new Timestamp fallback to preview mannequin value fallback to existing PDF token preview value fallback to stale Board value Check that the stop happens before Issue POST. --- 13 — SUCCESSFUL POST CARRIER For a complete valid READY set, inspect the payload. Expected carrier field: kpdf_actual_values Verify it contains only the required selected actual values. Conceptually: { "counter": ..., "timestamp.page": ..., "serial": ... } or: { "counter": ..., "timestamp.decided": ..., "serial": ... } depending on Timestamp priority and Routing requirements. No unrelated Board notes should ride along merely because they exist in localStorage. --- 14 — PHP RECEPTION BOUNDARY Inspect generate_request(). Expected DEV218 endpoint: browser POST carrier ↓ generate_request() ↓ decode / receive / narrow validation ↓ DEV218 boundary The values must NOT yet become: renderer input Token values PDF drawing values JPG drawing values Confirm the DEV218 carrier does not silently alter FINAL rendering behavior. This task proves transport/reception only. --- 15 — SERVER MUST NOT RE-INVENT ACTUAL VALUES Search PHP for any DEV218 logic equivalent to: query Counter DB for latest number query Serial DB query Timestamp product re-run Common producer outlet for actual value derive actual values server-side Expected: browser Board witness → POST → PHP receives that exact carrier No second source of truth. --- 16 — NO PRODUCER SIDE EFFECTS Confirm DEV218 does not call or trigger: Counter GET NUMBER Serial ISSUE Timestamp acquisition Timestamp DECIDE Board SET Issue PDF must remain a consumer action. Human product decisions remain product-owned. --- 17 — COMMON ROUTING PRESERVATION Byte compare where possible. Confirm: [ ] OPTION_WIRINGS unchanged [ ] Common Foundation unchanged [ ] membership schema unchanged [ ] seat order unchanged [ ] product address authority unchanged DEV218 may consume Routing. It may not redesign Routing. --- 18 — TIMESTAMP STANDARD HOLD PRESERVATION Explicit check: Timestamp Standard remains unfinished / HOLD. DEV218 must not contain logic that silently declares its current [DECIDE] equivalent to final usable Timestamp decision. The generic Board note: timestamp.decided may be understood by the PDF receiver contract, but DEV218 must not modify Timestamp Standard or manufacture that note itself. --- 19 — EXISTING PDF PROTECTION REGRESSION Inspect for accidental damage to existing DEV217 PDF systems. At minimum confirm no unintended changes to: Working Stock Refill Text authority Door Close Capacity five fixed-slot rotating pool Preview PDF/JPG existing rendering FINAL validation unrelated to DEV218 Common Routing If parent/child diff proves these areas untouched, state that as static evidence rather than re-proving every historical behavior from scratch. --- 20 — STATIC MODEL TESTS If practical, model at least these cases: CASE A required records all fresh + ready:true → complete set PASS CASE B required Counter ready absent → FAIL / no carrier CASE C required Serial expired → FAIL / no carrier CASE D timestamp.decided fresh + ready timestamp.page fresh + ready → decided only CASE E timestamp.decided unavailable timestamp.page fresh + ready → page only CASE F legacy record value present but ready absent → unavailable CASE G unrelated Board note exists → not included CASE H reader executes → localStorage byte/string unchanged --- 21 — RUNTIME STATUS Do NOT claim Runtime PASS from static evidence. If Runtime is not performed, report: Runtime: NOT RUN Future Runtime should separately prove: valid READY complete set → Issue POST carrier sent missing required READY → Issue POST not sent timestamp priority → correct single timestamp identity carried Admin Issue → same reader contract Public Issue → same reader contract Do not require renderer output to change in DEV218; that is explicitly later work. --- REQUIRED REPORT FORMAT 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE DEV218 INDEPENDENT RECEIVER / POST-CARRIER QA REPORT ARTIFACT IDENTITY Target SHA PASS / FAIL Parent SHA PASS / FAIL ZIP integrity PASS / FAIL Version identity PASS / FAIL DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY exactly one PASS / FAIL PHP lint PASS / FAIL NARROW DIFF Expected scope only PASS / FAIL Unexpected functional diff absent PASS / FAIL BOARD READER Storage identity preserved PASS / FAIL Record identity preserved PASS / FAIL Reader strictly READ ONLY PASS / FAIL Legacy ready absent rejected PASS / FAIL No migration/cleanup/write-back PASS / FAIL ROUTING Direct binder_ref/refill_ref used PASS / FAIL No runtime-ID address reconstruction PASS / FAIL Unlinked products not required PASS / FAIL Common Routing unchanged PASS / FAIL READY / TTL ready === true strict PASS / FAIL No readiness inference PASS / FAIL 12h boundary preserved PASS / FAIL No stale fallback PASS / FAIL TIMESTAMP decided > page priority PASS / FAIL Only winning timestamp posted PASS / FAIL Original note identity preserved PASS / FAIL Timestamp Standard HOLD preserved PASS / FAIL POST CARRIER Missing required value blocks POST PASS / FAIL Complete set permits carrier PASS / FAIL Only required values carried PASS / FAIL Value representations unchanged PASS / FAIL PHP BOUNDARY generate_request receives carrier PASS / FAIL No server re-query/reissue PASS / FAIL No Token consumption yet PASS / FAIL No renderer consumption yet PASS / FAIL ENTRY PATHS Admin uses same Reader contract PASS / FAIL Public uses same Reader contract PASS / FAIL Admin does not require Board global PASS / FAIL REGRESSION / ISOLATION Producer behavior untouched PASS / FAIL PDF historical systems untouched PASS / FAIL Token/Renderer untouched PASS / FAIL STATIC MODEL Complete READY set PASS / FAIL Missing READY PASS / FAIL Expired required record PASS / FAIL Timestamp decided priority PASS / FAIL Timestamp page fallback PASS / FAIL Legacy record rejection PASS / FAIL Unrelated-note exclusion PASS / FAIL Reader no-mutation PASS / FAIL RUNTIME Valid complete-set POST PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Missing-ready pre-POST STOP PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Timestamp priority carrier PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Admin path PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN Public path PASS / FAIL / NOT RUN STOP / WATCH [exact observation] 検査班への一言はこれでいいｗｗｗ > 🕊️ PDFに脳みそが生えてないか見てきて★ Boardから正しい住所のREADY付箋だけ拾い、足りなければPOST前で止まり、揃っていればそのままPHP受付まで運ぶだけ。 書くな、決めるな、再発行するな、描くな。 DEV218は運送屋まで。🤣 これなら前回READY-WITNESSを見た班が、そのままProducer側の証拠と対称にConsumer側を検査できるよーヽ(=´▽=)ﾉ 表示を増やす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev217-PREVIEW-FIXED-VISUAL-MANNEQUIN-VISIBLE.zip Zip アーカイブ ほーい🕊️ これのこと？ これでええ？ 9月16日(水) 7:13 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev222-PDF-BOARD-SOCKET.zip Zip アーカイブ 並列で調べてもらったのと同じのをPDFにもつっこんだんだけど 回路繋がってないからソケットだけなんだわ。 ちと他のと比較してブラウザ掲示板に書き込めるようになってるか確認いける？ 実機でまだ殴れないかわりに他と同じ出来になってるか見てほしいんだ 9月16日(水) 17:58 Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev8-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev8-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev8-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev9-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET.zip Zip アーカイブ これ、フライング作成したやつ 以下レスと照合してあってるか確認よろ！ うい。「実際に施工されたと直前レスが主張していた内容」から施工図を復元するね。 これは確認済みSOURCEから起こす正規施工図ではなく、事故った施工報告の内容を施工仕様へ逆変換したもの。だから後で現物ZIPと照合するための「復元施工図」扱い★ 🕊️ KAIA COMMON ACTUAL VALUE BOARD 12H BOARD LIFETIME / WHOLE-BOARD RESET RECOVERED CONSTRUCTION BLUEPRINT STATUS: RECOVERED FROM UNVERIFIED CONSTRUCTION REPORT PURPOSE: 現物監査用 CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY: Human Decision 済み IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION: NOT YET CONFIRMED --- 1. HUMAN DECISION Actual Value Board の寿命は、個々のrecordごとではなく、その掲示板一回分全体で12時間とする。 寿命開始点は、 > 空のBoardへ最初のActual Value recordがSETされた時刻 とする。 後続recordのSETによって寿命を延長しない。 12時間経過した掲示板は、中のrecordを個別判定せず全recordをまとめて退役させる。 退役後は空のBoardとなり、次にSETされたrecordを新しい一番乗りとして、新しい12時間を開始する。 --- 2. EXISTING AUTHORITY TO USE 新しい寿命authorityを作らない。 既存recordの written_at のみ使用する。 Board内にrecordが存在する場合、 Board start = MIN(valid record.written_at) をその掲示板の開始時刻として扱う。 Board lifetime = 12 hours from Board start 既存 TTL_MS の12時間値を維持する。 --- 3. REQUIRED BEHAVIOR Living Board First SET 10:00 ↓ record.written_at = 10:00 ↓ Board lifetime starts Timestamp SET 10:20 Serial SET 10:45 Board expiry remains 22:00 後続SETによる延命は禁止。 Expired Board 12時間到達後、Boardが次にSETまたはGETを処理するとき、 detect expired Board ↓ retire ALL existing Board records ↓ persist empty Board とする。 個別recordだけを削除してはならない。 --- 4. SET AFTER EXPIRY 期限切れ後、最初のアクセスがSETだった場合： expired old Board ↓ clear ALL old records ↓ perform requested SET normally ↓ new record.written_at = current time ↓ that record becomes first record of new Board ↓ new 12h lifetime begins 新しいgeneration ID等は持たない。 空になったこと自体がリセット境界。 --- 5. GET AFTER EXPIRY 期限切れ後、最初のアクセスがGETだった場合： expired old Board ↓ clear ALL old records ↓ persist empty Board ↓ GET returns NO VALUE / null 旧recordを返してはならない。 --- 6. LAZY RETIREMENT timer / interval / cron / background cleanup は追加しない。 したがって12時間到達時にJavaScriptが自発的にlocalStorageを書き換える必要はない。 12h reached ↓ (no Board access) ↓ physical storage may remain untouched next SET / GET ↓ expiry detected ↓ whole Board physically cleared 論理的な寿命境界そのものは12時間。 物理退役の実行契機のみlazyとする。 --- 7. PRESERVE 変更してはならないもの： STORAGE_KEY record identity binder_ref refill_ref name value written_at ready:true existing SET external API existing GET external API 12h TTL basis Common bootstrap Common Routing Producer authority/wiring Counter authority Timestamp authority Serial authority PDF authority Human decision timing Routingからgroup情報をBoardへ搬送しない。 --- 8. DO NOT ADD expires_at established_at generation ID session ID group ID Routing → Board membership cable Timestamp-specific lifetime authority product-specific Board knowledge timer interval cron background cleanup history archive rollback retry reissue Boardは「どの製品が同じ一式か」を判断しない。 Boardそのものが一式。 --- 9. INTENDED NARROW IMPLEMENTATION 直前の未確認施工報告が主張していた実装は、 retireBoardIfExpired(all) 相当の共通処理をBoard内に追加。 概念動作： records = readAll() if records empty: continue normally oldest = minimum valid written_at among records if now - oldest >= TTL_MS: writeAll({}) records = empty continue SET / GET using empty records SETとGET双方の入口でこの寿命確認を行う。 注意：この関数名・配置・実コードはまだ現物確認していない。 ここは直前報告から復元した施工内容であってSOURCE証明ではない。 --- 10. REQUIRED QA CASE A — FIRST SET T+00:00 Counter SET → 1 record → Board clock starts CASE B — LATER SET DOES NOT EXTEND T+00:20 Timestamp SET T+00:45 Serial SET → expiry remains T+12:00 from first SET CASE C — JUST BEFORE EXPIRY T+11:59:59.999 GET existing record → readable → all Board records remain CASE D — EXACT BOUNDARY T+12:00:00.000 GET → null → ALL old Board records physically absent CASE E — UNRELATED OLD MEMBERS Counter / Timestamp / Serial etc. → all old Board records retired together CASE F — SET IS FIRST ACCESS AFTER EXPIRY T+12h+ new SET → old Board cleared → new SET succeeds → only new-generation record remains → its written_at starts new 12h CASE G — SECOND CYCLE new Board + 12h → same retirement behavior repeats さらに静的に、 ready:true preserved Routing byte-preserved Producer wiring untouched SET/GET public contract preserved no new persistent TTL field no timer を確認する。 --- 11. TARGET LINEAGE CLAIMED BY THE ACCIDENTAL REPORT 直前報告では、以下へ施工したと主張されていた。 Counter Free dev8 READY-WITNESS → dev9 BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET Counter Standard dev7 READY-WITNESS → dev8 BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET Timestamp Free dev7 READY-WITNESS → dev8 BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET Serial Standard dev7 READY-WITNESS → dev8 BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET Timestamp Standard は対象外。 --- これで事故った施工報告とは独立した、照合可能な施工図になった。 次に現物4 ZIPを開けるなら、この紙を赤ペン基準にして、 「本当にこの施工なのか」だけREAD ONLYで検査できる。 そこで一個でも違ったら即「あれ？」STOP。施工済みという前提では扱わない★ 表示を増やす 9月17日(木) 5:10 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev242-PUBLICATION-PRESENTATION-BRACKETS.zip Zip アーカイブ たのむー 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — DEV243 EXTERNAL STATIC INSPECTION ROLE: INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS / INSPECTION SEAT READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO NEW CHILD ZIP. ================================================== TARGET ================================================== Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev243 施工班から引き渡された 「施工完了・静的車検未完了品」。 施工班自身による追加調査は行わせない。 ================================================== KNOWN CONSTRUCTION ================================================== Human Decision: Preset 05 / inset-double RIGHT-BOTTOM triangle cluster only Browser: BEFORE br:[[0,0],[-1,0],[0,-1]] AFTER br:[[-1,0],[0,-1]] PDF: 05 / right-bottom corner の 対応する [0,0] diamond のみ除外。 残り2粒の座標変更なし。 他3corner: PRESERVE 他preset: PRESERVE placement calculation: PRESERVE 透明空箱: 不要と施工班判断。 ================================================== ALREADY REPORTED BY CONSTRUCTION SEAT ================================================== main kaia-pdf.php: PHP lint PASS ZIP integrity: PASS DEV243 identity update: DONE ================================================== WHY EXTERNAL INSPECTION IS NEEDED ================================================== 施工班のstatic check中、以前指定されていたCommon path: includes/class-kaia-common-actual-value-board.php includes/class-kaia-common-routing.php に対象ファイルが存在せず、 Could not open input file となった。 施工班はここで正しくSTOP。 IMPORTANT: これは 「Commonが壊れた」 「Commonが消えた」 という証拠ではない。 確認済み事実は、 「使用した車検pathとDEV243実体が一致しなかった」 のみ。 ================================================== YOUR JOB ================================================== DEV243現物を独立して検査する。 1. ZIP内の実際のfile treeを確認し、 Common関連SOURCEの実在位置を特定する。 2. DEV243に存在する実際のCommon関連PHPについて、 適切なPHP lintを実施する。 3. 今回のDEV243差分がHuman Decisionどおり Browser: 05 / triangle / BR [0,0] only removal PDF: 05 / BR corresponding [0,0] only removal に限定されているか確認する。 4. 他3corner / 他preset / placement calculation / Commonその他保護対象へ意図しない変更が入っていないか 静的に確認する。 5. DEV243 identity / package integrityについて 確認可能な範囲を独立確認する。 これは検査。 施工班の未完了車検を 同じ施工班へ続行させる仕事ではない。 異常を発見しても修理しない。 ================================================== STOP RULE ================================================== 検査中に、 ・予想外のSOURCE構造 ・説明できない差分 ・Common自体の異常 ・DEV243以外へ波及する問題 ・親artifactとのidentity不整合 ・「あれ？」 / 「うわぁ……」 を発見したら、 その地点で 🔴 STOP。 原因探索・修理・再構築へ進まない。 観測事実と証拠だけ返す。 ================================================== RETURN ================================================== CHECK LOG - TARGET identity - ZIP integrity - actual Common paths - PHP lint targets / results - Browser 05 BR diff - PDF 05 BR diff - protected-area diff - unexpected changes - PASS / FAIL / STOP FINAL STATUS: PASS — DEV243 STATIC INSPECTION COMPLETE or 🔴 STOP — NO REPAIR. NO NEW ZIP. 表示を増やす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev243-PRESET05-RIGHT-BOTTOM-ORIGIN-DIAMOND-REMOVAL.zip Zip アーカイブ 9月17日(木) 6:54 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev245-SYSTEM-PUBLIC-PRESENTATION-MIGRATION.zip Zip アーカイブ たのむー🕊️ 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — DEV245 PHP PARSE ERROR PINPOINT ACCIDENT INSPECTION ROLE: INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS / INSPECTION SEAT ================================================== TARGET ================================================== Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev245 SYSTEM PUBLIC PRESENTATION MIGRATION SHA256: 74866f37e58cbe3fd9f11f375b48c040d869b5067147a7b3150d4cf6f99be84b PARENT ================================================== Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev244 PRESET05-FOUR-CORNER-ORIGIN-DIAMOND-REMOVAL Parent is SAFE / UNCHANGED. ================================================== KNOWN FAILURE ================================================== DEV245 construction completed far enough to enter STATIC INSPECTION. STATIC found: kaia-pdf.php → PHP Parse error → line 1415 → unexpected single-quoted string Observed fragment near reported failure: ").trim()&&t.color)return t.col..." Other static results already reported: Common Actual Value Board → PASS Common Routing → PASS ZIP integrity → PASS Human Runtime: NOT PERFORMED ================================================== WHY THIS INSPECTION EXISTS ================================================== DEV245 is an accident artifact. We are NOT trying to repair DEV245. Before creating a fresh child from safe DEV244, we want to know exactly what construction mistake caused the PHP parse failure so the same mistake is not repeated. Do not turn this into a full DEV245 architecture audit. ================================================== YOUR ONLY JOB ================================================== Inspect the parse-error location narrowly. Determine: 1. Exact SOURCE location of the syntax break. 2. Exact syntactic structure that became invalid. 3. Whether the break is introduced by DEV245 construction versus already present in parent DEV244. 4. If introduced by DEV245, identify the smallest relevant DEV244 → DEV245 diff responsible for the parse failure. 5. State the minimum accident-avoidance instruction for a future fresh reconstruction from DEV244. Example form only: “While reproducing approved construction X, do not emit Y inside PHP context in form Z.” Do NOT perform that repair. ================================================== COMPARISON RULE ================================================== Use DEV244 as known-safe parent. Compare only enough surrounding SOURCE to establish the parse-error cause confidently. Do not inspect unrelated A–E behavior merely because DEV245 contains those changes. Do not judge whether the overall migration works. Do not redesign the approved construction drawing. ================================================== STOP RULE ================================================== If the parse failure is NOT locally explainable, or the relevant diff exposes: - another unexpected dependency - multiple plausible causes - broader corruption - an architectural mismatch - “あれ？” - “うわぁ……” STOP EXACTLY THERE. Report the observed fact only. Do not continue investigating outward. Do not repair. Do not reconcile. ================================================== RETURN ================================================== CHECK LOG Target identity: PASS / FAIL Parent comparison: PASS / FAIL Parse-error location: Parent at corresponding location: DEV245 at failure: Root cause: Responsible minimal diff: Accident-avoidance note: Unexpected collateral: NONE / STOP FINAL CLASSIFICATION: A. LOCAL CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT — CAUSE PROVEN SAFE TO RECONSTRUCT ON FRESH CHILD WITH AVOIDANCE NOTE or B. CAUSE NOT LOCALLY PROVEN — STOP or C. BROADER ANOMALY FOUND — STOP ================================================== PROHIBITED ================================================== NO DEV245 REPAIR. NO DEV246 CREATION. NO “while I’m here” cleanup. NO architecture changes. NO new authority. NO migration redesign. NO Human Runtime. ONE-LINE JOB: 事故車は直すな★ 1415行目付近で何を踏んだかだけ確認して、 次の新紙で同じものを踏まないための 事故現場メモを持って帰ってこい。 表示を増やす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev244-PRESET05-FOUR-CORNER-ORIGIN-DIAMOND-REMOVAL.zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ 🕊️🔴 解析便受領。STOPも正しい。 で、これかなり惜しいところまで来てる（笑） 現時点では二つを分けて扱えばいい。 DEV245単体の事故地点 → PROVEN PHP single-quoted $html ↓ 埋め込みJavaScript ↓ 未escape single quote ├ content||'' ├ td.type==='timestamp' └ '#3858A6' ↓ PHP文字列境界破壊 ↓ PARSE ERROR ここはもう事故現場として捕獲済み。 一方、 DEV244 → DEV245 この壊れたJSが 「DEV245施工によって新規導入された」 ↓ 現物diff証明 → DEV244現物が解析席になかったので未証明 だから分類Bで止めた。これはちゃんとしてる。 次どうするか DEV244現物がこちらで確保できるなら、解析班にそれだけ渡して比較を完了させるのが一番安い。 大規模再解析はいらない。 DEV244対応箇所 vs DEV245事故箇所 見る ↓ systemColor() / 問題のJSが 245施工で入ったものか確認 ↓ YES ↓ A. LOCAL CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT CAUSE PROVEN ↓ 事故回避メモ確定 ↓ DEV244からNEW child 逆にDEV244現物が手元にないなら、無理して探し回ってまで証明するかは別判断になる。親がSAFEなのは運用上分かっていても、今回こちらから解析班に**「現物diffで証明しろ」**と注文した以上、解析班がそれを勝手に省略しなかったのは正解。 なので俺なら、DEV244 ZIPあるならポイッと解析班へ渡す。 指示は一行レベルで十分。 > 「これDEV244現物。さっき未完だった親子対応箇所だけ比較して続行。ほかを見るな★」 🤣 🔬「事故原因ほぼ見えてます！」 🕊️「親にも同じ釘落ちてなかった証明は？」 🔬「親がいません！」 🪑「じゃあ親渡せば終わりじゃん★」 という状態。 表示を増やす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev246-STATIC-STOP-ACCIDENT-ARTIFACT.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev247-JPG-PUBLICATION-COLOR-PRIORITY.zip Zip アーカイブ DEV247 HUMAN RUNTIME — CORRECTED WITNESS 1. Fixed Visual / BASE System by Kaia Spec が焼かれていない。 Human Decision: この地点では最終的な色が決定済み。 以後に色を変える変数はない。 → System はここで焼いてよい。 → JPGの〈掲載可〉も、ONならここで焼いてよい。 2. System presence System by Kaia Spec は常駐家具。 ON/OFF機能は存在しない。 Publication ON/OFFをSystemの表示制御として扱わない。 → 「Publication OFFでSystem消失」は Human witnessではない。撤回。 3. System color System by Kaia Spec は表示され続ける。 しかしHumanが色条件を変更しても、 Systemの表示色が追従しない。 → HUMAN RUNTIME FAIL 現象： 常駐しているが着せ替え不能。 4. Publication color 今回のRuntimeでは、 BASE生成地点で焼く方針へHuman Decisionが更新された。 Systemと〈掲載可〉は同じ既存色優先順位を使う。 〈掲載可〉はJPGでONの場合のみ存在。 Systemは常時存在。 STATUS: DEV247 STATIC PASS HUMAN RUNTIME FAIL NEXT: READ ONLY SOURCE ANALYSIS 解析対象： - なぜSystemの色がHumanの色変更に追従しないか - Systemを決定済み色でBASEへ焼く既存経路 - JPG〈掲載可〉を同じ決定済み色でBASEへ焼く既存経路 NO REPAIR YET. 表示を減らす 9月17日(木) 9:11 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev247-JPG-PUBLICATION-COLOR-PRIORITY(1).zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — DEV248 VISUAL SAMPLE TEMPORARY HELPER ANCHOR STOP PINPOINT SOURCE AUDIT ROLE: INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS SEAT READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO NEW CHILD. NO ZIP. NO RESUME OF DEV248 WORKSPACE. ================================================== AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE ================================================== DEV247 — JPG PUBLICATION COLOR PRIORITY EXPECTED SHA256: e4e1ce741f096a91f007b5dca081fc11d770eb6f77e54420409108a842979dc9 First verify exact artifact identity. ================================================== INCIDENT ================================================== A Human Visual Sample construction was started from protected DEV247. During narrow work intended to expose ONE shared technical color resolver to both Admin/Editor and Public presentation, construction STOPPED before PHP lint. Observed construction STOP: temporary helper anchor unavailable Current state: DEV247 protected parent: UNCHANGED DEV248 candidate workspace: INCOMPLETE NOT AN ARTIFACT DO NOT USE AS SOURCE AUTHORITY DO NOT REPAIR PHP lint: NOT REACHED STATIC: NOT RUN ZIP: NOT CREATED ================================================== YOUR ONLY JOB ================================================== Using pristine DEV247 only, determine what SOURCE fact caused the planned temporary-helper anchor assumption to fail. NARROWLY answer: 1. What exact existing SOURCE anchor was the planned construction expecting to match? 2. Does that exact anchor exist in pristine DEV247? 3. If NO: what exact DEV247 SOURCE structure exists at that intended location instead? 4. Was the failed anchor assumption caused by: A. expected text/anchor simply not existing in DEV247 B. correct machinery exists but under a different exact surrounding SOURCE structure C. construction order assumed an intermediate/temporary helper that was never part of pristine DEV247 D. something else directly provable from the narrow comparison 5. Does pristine DEV247 still contain all previously proven ingredients required for the presentation-finishing design: - existing Public systemColor() behavior - Creator Credit color input - Text 1–5 color inputs - Counter color input - Timestamp color input - Serial color input - Issue PDF button color authority - kpdfOpenPreview(...) presentation furniture for System - JPG Publication presentation furniture This final check is ONLY to determine whether the previous design premise remains intact. Do NOT redesign the bridge. ================================================== IMPORTANT ================================================== The incomplete DEV248 workspace is NOT the repair target. Do NOT continue from it. Do NOT make its temporary state authoritative. The protected DEV247 parent is the authority for this audit. If a later construction is approved, it must again follow the normal fresh-child rule. ================================================== DO NOT ================================================== Do NOT: - fix the missing anchor - invent a replacement anchor - choose a new insertion point - move functions - create a shared resolver - duplicate systemColor() - create a carrier - change persistence - change presentation - change position - change typography - bake System - bake Publication - inspect 火縄銃5人 - broaden into architecture review ================================================== STOP RULE ================================================== If answering the narrow anchor question requires investigation outside the directly involved resolver / presentation SOURCE, or anything produces: 「あれ？」 「うわぁ……」 STOP EXACTLY THERE. Report only the newly observed fact. No diagnosis beyond that boundary. No repair. ================================================== RETURN ================================================== CHECK LOG Target identity: PASS / FAIL Expected construction anchor: Present in pristine DEV247: YES / NO Actual pristine DEV247 structure: Classification: A / B / C / D Previously proven presentation ingredients: INTACT / NOT INTACT / STOP DEV247 modified: NO Incomplete DEV248 workspace used as authority: NO FINAL: ANCHOR ASSUMPTION EXPLAINED or STOP — NEW SOURCE ANOMALY ================================================== ONE-LINE JOB ================================================== 「フックがない」の原因だけ 無傷のDEV247を見て確認してこい★ 新しいフックを付けるな。 試着を再開するな。 壁も剥がすな。 火縄銃は見るな。 表示を減らす なあなあ 不思議事故おきてるー 9月17日(木) 14:44 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev249-HUMAN-VISUAL-SAMPLE-CAPTURE-PRESENTATION-FIX.zip Zip アーカイブ 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE — DEV248 / DEV249 INDEPENDENT ARTIFACT IDENTITY + EXACT DIFF AUDIT ROLE: EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT INSPECTION SEAT READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO REDESIGN. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO NEW ZIP. IMPORTANT: DO NOT begin by explaining the Human Runtime failure. FIRST determine whether the two supplied artifacts are genuinely the expected old/new pair and what actually differs between them. ================================================== EXPECTED ARTIFACTS ================================================== PARENT: DEV248 — HUMAN VISUAL SAMPLE PRESENTATION FINISHING Expected SHA256: 23c85f1e2adec99e767d15be15bd252326b06bf32faf81e2506728b8de039a3c CHILD: DEV249 — HUMAN VISUAL SAMPLE CAPTURE PRESENTATION FIX Expected SHA256: f5979be944459b794f4fd2fea7cd1242021fbd63ebf0bf5c33ae5df8edc7de7c ================================================== HUMAN RUNTIME WITNESS ================================================== Human reports that DEV249 visually appeared unchanged from DEV248. Additionally: Publication: ON → visible OFF → hidden ON → remains hidden Do NOT diagnose this yet. Artifact mix-up / stale or wrong package / incorrect construction has NOT been excluded. ================================================== YOUR FIRST JOB — IDENTITY ================================================== For BOTH supplied ZIPs: 1. Calculate actual SHA256. 2. Report exact root folder / plugin structure. 3. Read plugin/version identity available inside the artifact. 4. Confirm DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md identity where applicable. 5. Determine whether they are actually two distinct artifacts. Return PASS / FAIL independently for DEV248 and DEV249. If either SHA does not match: STOP IMMEDIATELY. Do not continue to diff or diagnose. ================================================== YOUR SECOND JOB — EXACT DIFF ================================================== Only if BOTH identities PASS: Perform an exact recursive comparison of DEV248 vs DEV249. Report: - files added - files removed - files changed - files byte-identical For every changed SOURCE file, show the minimal exact diff hunks. We specifically expect the claimed DEV249 construction to concern ONLY the two narrow Fixed Base capture presentation points: A. System DEV248 contains a Fixed Base capture removal equivalent to: var fixedCompany = clone.querySelector('.kpdf-preview-company-mark'); if(fixedCompany) fixedCompany.remove(); Claimed DEV249 behavior: System furniture remains intact during that capture. B. Publication Normal Publication presentation must remain unchanged: right = outerGap bottom = presentationMid transform = translateY(50%) normal z-index = 25 Capture mask must remain intact: .kpdf-fixed-visual-capture-mask z-index = 29 four edges / geometry preserved Claimed DEV249 behavior: ONLY inside Fixed Base capture clone, the existing Publication furniture is raised above the mask for capture. ================================================== QUESTIONS TO ANSWER ================================================== 1. Is DEV249 genuinely different from DEV248? 2. Does the exact SOURCE diff actually implement the two claimed changes? 3. Are there ANY other runtime/source changes between the artifacts? 4. Does DEV249 still contain an active fixedCompany.remove() on the relevant Fixed Base capture path? 5. Does DEV249 actually contain the claimed capture-only Publication foreground operation? 6. Are the normal Publication coordinates / normal z-index unchanged? 7. Is the capture mask itself unchanged? 8. Does DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY.md accurately describe the actual diff? ================================================== DO NOT ================================================== Do not explain the Human Runtime failure yet. Do not repair anything. Do not select a new implementation. Do not investigate browser cache/state. Do not investigate ON/OFF behavior beyond reporting what the exact DEV248→DEV249 SOURCE diff does or does not change. Do not assume the construction report is correct. Do not assume the Human loaded the wrong artifact. Prove artifact identity and exact differences first. ================================================== STOP RULE ================================================== If you encounter: - SHA mismatch - duplicate artifacts - unexpected source differences - missing claimed change - extra runtime change - artifact identity inconsistency - or any other「あれ？」 STOP AT THAT FACT. Do not investigate why. Return the anomaly exactly as observed. ================================================== RETURN FORMAT ================================================== CHECK LOG DEV248 SHA: expected: actual: PASS / FAIL DEV249 SHA: expected: actual: PASS / FAIL ARTIFACT DISTINCTNESS: PASS / FAIL EXACT FILE DIFF: Added: ... Removed: ... Changed: ... Byte-identical: ... CLAIMED SYSTEM CHANGE: PASS / FAIL Evidence: ... CLAIMED PUBLICATION CHANGE: PASS / FAIL Evidence: ... UNEXPECTED SOURCE CHANGE: NONE / STOP DEVELOPMENT-HISTORY: PASS / FAIL FINAL: EXACT EXPECTED CHILD or STOP — ARTIFACT / DIFF ANOMALY SOURCE modified: NO Repair attempted: NO 表示を増やす うわー…わからんのが発火した ちと実機もちこむから確認してほしい Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev218-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-RECEIVER-POST-CARRIER(2).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev260-JPG-SECOND-ROLL-CALL-REMOVAL.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev259-HUMAN-CR-SAMPLE-COMPLETED-SURFACE-BYPASS.zip Zip アーカイブ 259からプラグひっこぬいたやつ。ここで受け口検品してもらったやつ。もってきた。 Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev9-HUMAN-REFILL-RESET.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Standard-v1.1.4-dev7-READY-WITNESS(2).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Serial-Standard-v1.1.12-dev7-READY-WITNESS(2).zip Zip アーカイブ 多分他の実機はこれでいいと思うんだけど どうかな Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev7-READY-WITNESS(2).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Timestamp-Free-v1.0.21-dev8-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET(1).zip Zip アーカイブ スマホだと全部みきれないんだよなあ… んでおそらく8に フリーの自動で始めから点呼OKになってるのがはいってるはず 多分セットずれおこしてるから 一度正常なので確認したいから指摘よろ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev4-COLLISION-OFF-SIMPLIFICATION.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev5-BROWSER-DECIDED-STATE-READOUT.zip Zip アーカイブ うーんこのへん？ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev9-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev8-READY-WITNESS(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev7-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-PRODUCER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Counter-Free-v1.1.5-dev6-KAI43-BROWSER-DECIDED-STATE-READOUT(4).zip Zip アーカイブ どうだろー(；´Д｀) あってるー？ あーダメ！ わけわからん これで発火しなーい 狐テストでもおなじー みてー ふりーで うぇえ…この組み合わせでこれでてる うぇえ… Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev218-ACTUAL-VALUE-BOARD-RECEIVER-POST-CARRIER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev219-FIXED-VISUAL-COMPANY-MARK-FRONT.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev221-ACTUAL-VALUE-RECEIPT-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev222-PDF-BOARD-SOCKET.zip Zip アーカイブ とりあえずなげる Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev223-PHP-ACTUAL-VALUE-RECEIPT-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev224-PUBLIC-PDF-EMPTY-FURNITURE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev225-PUBLIC-TOKEN-RECORD-CARRIER.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev227-SAVE-TOKEN-PRESENTATION-FINAL-SYNC.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev228-TOKEN-SAVE-AUTHORITY-RESTORE.zip Zip アーカイブ ドンドコドンドコ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev234-RUNTIME-QA-REFILL-RESOLUTION-WITNESS.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev233-RUNTIME-QA-PHP-ENTRANCE-DIRECT-PLUG.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev232-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET-FIXED(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev231-RUNTIME-QA-HTTP-ERROR-BODY-WITNESS(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev231-PUBLIC-ACTUAL-TOKEN-OUTPUT-MAINLINE-RUNTIME-QA(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev231-RUNTIME-QA-FINAL-PNG-CABLE-ISOLATION(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev230-TOKEN-LL-UNDERLINE-RETIREMENT-WAREHOUSE(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev229-TOKEN-PRESENTATION-UNDERLINE-LL.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev228-TOKEN-SAVE-AUTHORITY-RESTORE(1).zip Zip アーカイブ なんかボードってかいてるのがあるが… 232いれたらこれになった Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev232-BOARD-12H-LIFETIME-RESET-FIXED(1)(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev231-RUNTIME-QA-HTTP-ERROR-BODY-WITNESS(1)(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev230-TOKEN-LL-UNDERLINE-RETIREMENT-WAREHOUSE(1)(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev229-TOKEN-PRESENTATION-UNDERLINE-LL(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev228-TOKEN-SAVE-AUTHORITY-RESTORE(1)(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev227-SAVE-TOKEN-PRESENTATION-FINAL-SYNC(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev226-PUBLIC-TOKEN-OUTPUT-BUS-SOCKETS(1).zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev265-PUBLIC-BOARD-RESULT-DROP-OFF.zip Zip アーカイブ あいうえこかきくすせそたちつてと (4).pdf PDF これなー？ トークンが載らないんだよ 情報は掲示板に全部つっこんでそこから読ませることで認証るいをスルーさせたんだが うい、DEV265と出力PDFを突き合わせた。 Board搬送そのものは通ってる形なのに、Tokenが出力されてないという症状で合ってる。添付PDFの1ページ目も、Human Text・画像・Frame・System markは焼けている一方、Actual Token値は見当たらない。 あいうえこかきくすせそたちつてと (4) そしてSOURCEで 「あれ？」を1個見つけたのでSTOP 🕊️🔴 DEV265の道はここまではちゃんとある。 Product Board counter / timestamp.page / serial ↓ collect(req) PDF Board 同じ値をPDF住所へ deliver() ↓ collectPdf(req) delivered ↓ lastActual ↓ surface('preview' / 'final' / 'jpg') ↓ Output Bus valuesFor() ↓ Public Token Presentation.build() つまり、しゃむが言ってた 情報を掲示板に全部突っ込んで、そこから読ませる この搬送道路はSOURCEに実在する。 DEV265履歴自身も「Public Preview / Final / POST / JPG はdrop-off後のPDF Board result copyを読む」と明記してる。 で、Token表示側を見た。 build() はText本文を tokenize() して、短記号を見つけたらActual値へ置換する構造。 ところが短記号を認識する入口が、 【counter】 【serial】 【date】 【time】 【datetime】 【timestamp1】 になってる。 そして認識したキーをそのまま、 symbols[key] へ取りに行く。 ここで あれ？。 現在のToken Definition側との対応をまだ確認してない。 つまり現時点では、 Board VALUE ↓ PDF Board ↓ Output Bus ↓ values ↓ ← ここまでは道路あり Token Recognition ↓ Token Definition ↓ Actual substitution 「値が届いてない」と決める根拠はない。 むしろDEV264履歴に、 Token layer remains emptyなら次の境界は Token recognition / Actual-value substitution upstream of display と、まさに今回の症状用の診断分岐が書かれてる。 そしてDEV265はそのDEV264診断構造を変更せず保持して、Actual-value delivery roadだけ変更した子。 なので今の第一容疑地点はかなり狭い。 Board → PDF搬送ではなく、 保存されたTextの短記号 ↔ token_symbols Definition ↔ Public tokenizer の三者が同じ名前で会えてるか。 ここから Saved Record の実際の token_symbols キーまで照合すれば決着しそうだけど、そこで追加調査になるのでSTOPした★ 🕊️🔬 施工なし。原因確定もまだしてない。 次はこの「名前合わせ」だけ見ればいい。 情報源 9月19日(土) 5:24 Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev268-PUBLIC-FIXED-RECORD-PAPER-CARGO.zip Zip アーカイブ 解析よろお！！ 君のおかげで超すすんだよ！！！ 🕊️ KAIA PDF FREE DEV268 TIMESTAMP PAYLOAD SHAPE — NARROW SOURCE AUDIT ROLE: INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS SEAT READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO NEW CHILD ZIP. NO PRODUCT REDESIGN. NO ARCHITECTURE EXPANSION. ================================================== TARGET ================================================== Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev268-PUBLIC-FIXED-RECORD-PAPER-CARGO.zip EXPECTED SHA256: c81d9218a1df9bfa81b284c6e6cddda4b011040e18539d4126f1e903bb41d5ad First verify exact artifact identity. If identity does not match: STOP. ================================================== RUNTIME WITNESS ================================================== DEV268 produced a major positive witness. Public / generated output now visibly contains: COUNTER 000001 → visible → Leading Zero behavior also visibly active SERIAL 2DC3-X6KQ → visible HUMAN TEXT → visible IMAGE / FRAME / BASE → visible TIMESTAMP LOCATIONS → instead of formatted date/time text, output visibly contains: [object Object] split across the expected Timestamp Token positions. Therefore: DO NOT investigate the entire Token architecture. DO NOT begin by assuming: - Token recognition failed - Small Printer failed globally - Board delivery failed globally - Counter / Serial paths are broken Counter and Serial are already positive runtime witnesses. ================================================== CURRENT SOURCE FACTS ALREADY OBSERVED ================================================== DEV268 Product-side Carrier collect() currently does: timestamp.page ↓ r.value ↓ out['timestamp.page'] = r.value PDF-side packaging then does conceptually: packageFor( 'timestamp.page', actual['timestamp.page'], record ) and stores: { identity: 'timestamp.page', actual: , presentation: ..., paper: ..., ... } collectPdf() later returns: out['timestamp.page'] = package.actual Output Bus forwards that value. Small Printer Timestamp resolve currently reaches a shape equivalent to: value = values['timestamp.page'] local = String(value) Then: date → local.slice(...) time → local.slice(...) datetime → local Runtime output: [object Object] strongly suggests that Timestamp value is an object by the time Small Printer stringifies it. THIS IS A WORKING SOURCE OBSERVATION, NOT YET A COMPLETE ROOT-CAUSE CLAIM. ================================================== ONLY JOB ================================================== Trace the EXACT Timestamp payload shape through CURRENT DEV268. Follow only this road: Timestamp Product Board record ↓ Carrier collect() ↓ PDF packageFor() ↓ PDF Board set() ↓ collectPdf() ↓ Output Bus ↓ Small Printer resolve() Determine: 1. What is the exact runtime/source shape of: Product Board timestamp.page value Is it: - scalar string? - object? - object containing multiple Timestamp representations? - wrapper containing metadata + display value? 2. If it is an object, list the exact fields available. Example only — DO NOT ASSUME: { instantId: ..., epochMs: ..., iso: ..., ... } Report the actual SOURCE fields. 3. Determine whether CURRENT source already contains an authoritative Timestamp formatter / extractor elsewhere. Search narrowly for code that already converts the same Timestamp object into: date time full datetime Prefer CURRENT active source over historical code. 4. Determine whether the Product Board payload is intended to remain structured and the consumer is expected to extract a display string, OR whether the Carrier was expected to transport an already-formatted scalar. Do NOT choose between those models until SOURCE proves it. ================================================== VERY IMPORTANT COMPARISON ================================================== Compare all three actual-value cargo shapes: COUNTER Product Board value shape → scalar/object? TIMESTAMP Product Board value shape → scalar/object? SERIAL Product Board value shape → scalar/object? We need to know whether Timestamp is intentionally structurally different. Do NOT redesign Counter or Serial. They are comparison witnesses only. ================================================== DESIRED OUTPUT ================================================== Return SOURCE FACTS FIRST. Use a compact physical map like: Counter Board value = "000001" / scalar Carrier = scalar Printer = scalar Runtime = PASS Timestamp Board value = { ...exact fields... } Carrier = object unchanged PDF cargo = object unchanged Printer = String(object) Runtime = [object Object] Serial Board value = "2DC3-X6KQ" / scalar Carrier = scalar Printer = scalar Runtime = PASS Then identify the FIRST exact point where: structured Timestamp payload becomes incorrectly treated as: printable text IF SOURCE proves such a point. ================================================== SECONDARY QUESTION ================================================== If CURRENT source already has a correct Timestamp formatter/extractor, report: - function name - where it lives - what input shape it accepts - what output forms it produces - whether reusing it would preserve existing authority DO NOT implement reuse. DO NOT copy it. DO NOT write a repair patch. Just report whether the existing furniture exists. ================================================== DO NOT ================================================== Do NOT: - modify Timestamp Product authority - flatten/rewrite Product Board records - invent a new timestamp schema - rename timestamp.page - introduce timestamp.decided - change Board identity - touch Counter - touch Serial - change Small Printer architecture - change Token seats - change Saved Record - change Common Routing / Switchboard - create a new formatter unless SOURCE proves none exists - convert objects to JSON merely to make them printable - treat "[object Object]" as a display-format problem without tracing the original payload shape first ================================================== STOP RULE ================================================== STOP immediately if you find: - more than one active Timestamp payload schema, - ambiguity about which Timestamp producer is CURRENT, - Product Board authority conflict, - Common Routing / Switchboard conflict, - timestamp.page carrying a different meaning than expected, - an existing formatter whose authority/status is unclear, - or any "あれ？ / うわぁ……" Do not continue into repair. Return the exact observed SOURCE fact. ================================================== HUMAN INTENT IN ONE LINE ================================================== "Counter and Serial are now printing correctly. Find out exactly what Timestamp is carrying in the truck, and where that structured cargo first gets mistaken for printable text." 🕊️ END HANDOFF 表示を増やす 9月19日(土) 21:41 Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.2.2-INTERNAL-CLASS-RESTORE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Site-Counter-v0.1.1-8DIGIT-KAIASPEC-MASK.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Site-Serial-v0.1.0-WP-SEPARATE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Site-Timestamp-v0.1.0-WP-SEPARATE.zip Zip アーカイブ たすけてーこれだとなんかエラーはくぅうう 🕊️ KAIA SITE CUSTOM PRODUCT vs SITE COMMON SWITCHBOARD / ACTUAL VALUE BOARD CROSS-SYSTEM HORIZONTAL AUDIT ROLE: INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS SEAT READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO NEW CHILD ZIP. NO PRODUCT REDESIGN. NO SITE REDESIGN. NO ARCHITECTURE EXPANSION. NO "FIX WHILE YOU ARE HERE". ================================================== WHY THIS AUDIT EXISTS ================================================== Kaia Site Custom was created from the known Product line so that WordPress can recognize the Site plugins as separate plugins. The Public PDF generation failure is now known to exist already at the earliest SITE PDF WP-SEPARATE stage. Later SITE changes therefore must NOT be assumed to be the origin. A narrow test restoring the SITE PDF internal PHP class identity back to the Product DEV271 class identity did NOT restore PDF generation. Therefore: DO NOT continue vertically digging through later PDF-only modifications. Instead, inspect the Product system and SITE system HORIZONTALLY around their shared/intersection infrastructure. The Human specifically wants the area around: - Common Switchboard - Actual Value Board - Product → PDF handoff / routing boundary ================================================== CURRENT QUESTION ================================================== When Product and SITE machines exist as separate WordPress plugins: Does the SITE system still use the intended Common Switchboard / Actual Value Board / PDF handoff correctly? Or does WP-separation cause any registration, address, routing, hook, class/static reference, ownership, first-registration, shared-global, or receiver-selection difference around that boundary? THIS IS AN AUDIT QUESTION ONLY. Do not assume that such a problem exists. ================================================== COMPARE HORIZONTALLY ================================================== Place the corresponding Product and SITE machines side by side. PRODUCT SIDE: - CURRENT Product Counter - CURRENT Product Timestamp - CURRENT Product Serial - Product PDF DEV271 SITE SIDE: - CURRENT SITE Counter test machine - CURRENT SITE Timestamp test machine - CURRENT SITE Serial test machine - CURRENT SITE PDF test machine Use the exact supplied artifacts. Do not substitute older READY-WITNESS versions when a newer supplied CURRENT artifact exists. ================================================== PRIMARY AUDIT ZONE ================================================== Inspect ONLY the routes/furniture necessary to understand: 1. Common Switchboard registration / ownership 2. Common Switchboard lookup / dispatch 3. Actual Value Board producer registration 4. Actual Value Board record address / identity 5. Actual Value Board receiver/read path 6. Counter → Board → PDF relationship 7. Timestamp → Board → PDF relationship 8. Serial → Board → PDF relationship 9. PDF's own Board address / completion record where relevant 10. PHP/JS globals used at these intersections 11. WordPress hooks/actions/filters used at these intersections 12. class/static references used by routing adapters 13. plugin-load / first-registration guards if present 14. duplicate-registration / already-exists guards if present 15. shared names that Product and SITE may both attempt to own 16. any Product-specific identity that SITE routing still requires 17. any SITE-specific identity introduced at the WP-SEPARATE boundary that changes which shared furniture is reached ================================================== IMPORTANT DISTINCTION ================================================== Do NOT treat identical shared furniture as automatically wrong. SITE was intentionally made only separate enough for WordPress to see it as another plugin. Shared internal furniture may therefore be CORRECT. We are looking for a concrete routing/ownership difference, not merely matching names. Likewise: Do NOT treat a renamed class/plugin identity as automatically wrong. The previous narrow class-restore test did not restore PDF generation. ================================================== FOLLOW THE WIRES ================================================== For each Product machine and corresponding SITE machine, establish: PRODUCER ↓ registration / route ↓ Common Switchboard ↓ Actual Value Board ↓ record identity/address ↓ PDF receiver / handoff Record WHO registers WHAT, under WHICH NAME/ADDRESS, and WHO later reads or dispatches it. Prefer a simple side-by-side route map. Example form only: PRODUCT: Counter → [registration identity] → [Switchboard furniture] → [Board address] → PDF SITE: Counter → [registration identity] → [Switchboard furniture] → [Board address] → PDF Repeat only as necessary for Timestamp and Serial. Do not invent missing links 表示を増やす Kaia-PDF-Free-v0.1.0-dev271-PUBLIC-JPG-REPOSTING-MARK-RETIREMENT.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.1.0-WP-SEPARATE.zip Zip アーカイブ たぶんこれだとおもう。 再現した ( ﾟдﾟ)？ 犯人 どこかに亡霊がいる。 Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.2.3-SITE-PATH-PIN-RUNTIME-TEST.zip Zip アーカイブ これ？ 9月20日(日) 15:25 Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.3.6-REFERENCE-REPRINT-JPG-WHOLE-SCALE.zip Zip アーカイブ Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.2.5-ACTIVE-VERSION-IDENTITY-ALIGNMENT.zip Zip アーカイブ これよろ！ 🕊️ KAIA SITE PDF COUNTER LEADING-ZERO AUTHORITY TRACE READ ONLY. NO CONSTRUCTION. NO REPAIR. NO SOURCE MODIFICATION. NO PRODUCT REDESIGN. NO NEW CHILD ZIP. VERY NARROW SOURCE AUDIT. ================================================== PURPOSE ================================================== Kaia Site PDF currently has a Runtime symptom: Counter Product actual issued value: 1 JPG output: 00000001 Human intends the existing PDF Counter Token presentation setting: Leading Zero = Hide to be the default presentation for a newly initialized Counter Token. We need to determine exactly why the current output can still reach: 00000001 Do NOT assume the cause. Do NOT assume there is a missing wire. Do NOT assume the Small Printer fallback is wrong. Do NOT assume an old Saved Design is the cause. Trace SOURCE first. ================================================== IMPORTANT HISTORY ================================================== The Site PDF lineage originally inherited the Product-side PDF structure. A temporary physical-path workaround existed during SITE separation. That temporary route was later retired. Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.2.5-ACTIVE-VERSION-IDENTITY-ALIGNMENT.zip is an early SITE baseline after the physical identity / ghost-address separation had been established. It is useful as an architectural baseline. Later relevant reference: Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.3.3-DISPLAY-TOGGLE-PRESENTATION-REFRESH.zip In v0.3.3 the existing Counter Token UI contains: Leading Zero Show Hide and Show is the initial HTML selection. The existing presentation behavior is conceptually: zero === 'show' → pad raw Counter value to max_display_digits zero === 'hide' → use raw Counter value Later: Kaia-Site-PDF-v0.3.4-COUNTER-TOKEN-ZERO-HIDE-DEFAULT.zip was intended to make the EXISTING UI Hide option the default. The intended narrow change was NOT: - changing Counter Product actual values - removing Counter leading-zero capability - forcing Hide internally everywhere - changing Small Printer resolver semantics - inventing a new zero authority The intended change was: EXISTING Counter Token Leading Zero UI → Hide is initial/default position A previous experimental idea had attempted an internal forced-hide behavior. Human rejected that direction. The desired architecture remained: use the existing UI setting and make Hide its initial/default position. ================================================== IMPORTANT CURRENT FINDING ================================================== Do NOT begin from the assumption that v0.3.4 simply forgot to connect the UI to the Token definition. A preliminary comparison found existing furniture that appears to perform: Counter UI ↓ kpdfRefreshTokenMember(...) ↓ kpdfTokenSymbols.counter.zero and existing saved Token definitions may also be applied back to the UI. Therefore an already-saved: zero = show may potentially override the HTML initial Hide selection. This is NOT yet accepted as the cause. It is only a candidate that must be proven or rejected from SOURCE. ================================================== TARGET QUESTION ================================================== For the CURRENT Site PDF architecture, determine: WHO supplies the effective Counter zero value that reaches the actual JPG Small Printer presentation when the observed output becomes: 00000001 Trace the complete authority chain. ================================================== TRACE THESE STAGES ================================================== Trace Counter zero through all relevant stages, in order: 1. HTML/UI initial state 2. Counter Token creation / initialization 3. existing saved Token-definition restoration 4. kpdfTokenSymbols working state 5. Human SAVE 6. Saved Design Record 7. reload / recall behavior 8. Small Printer / JPG printPaper preparation 9. Counter Token definition selected for printing 10. actual Counter value resolution 11. final zero-padding decision 12. JPG capture At every stage identify: SOURCE OF VALUE VALUE SHAPE AUTHORITY FALLBACK, if any whether it can produce "show" whether it can produce "hide" ================================================== COMPARE THREE CASES ================================================== If SOURCE supports it, separately trace these three situations: CASE A Fresh Counter Token No prior saved Counter Token definition exists. CASE B Existing Saved Design contains: counter.zero = show Then plugin/UI version changes so HTML now defaults to Hide. CASE C Human explicitly selects Hide and performs the normal Human SAVE flow. For each case determine what value the JPG Small Printer should receive from CURRENT SOURCE. Do not infer Runtime behavior beyond what SOURCE proves. ================================================== REFERENCE USE RULE ================================================== Use old versions only as wiring references. DO NOT copy old filenames, classes, physical paths, plugin identities, or obsolete SITE-separation furniture into CURRENT. v0.2.5: architectural SITE baseline / physical-identity reference v0.3.3: old Counter Zero wiring reference v0.3.4: intended Hide-default transition reference, if available CURRENT: authoritative target architecture Compare ROLES and FLOW, not merely matching names. ================================================== SPECIAL CHECK ================================================== Determine whether: