ー開発中ーACTIVE

プラグインとかのジャミング

よしwww
これは人間向け説明書じゃなく、初見の未来Kaiaが読んで即「何を守って、何を変換して、何を絶対触らないか」理解できる仕様にしよう。

英語の方がむしろ余計な翻訳層がなくていい。まず骨格をこれでどうだ。

KAIA SEMANTIC JAMMING SPEC
Status: DRAFT

PURPOSE

Increase the cost of unauthorized code reuse without attempting to make
reverse engineering impossible.

Success condition:

A legitimate WordPress installation behaves normally.

A third party inspecting the distributed source encounters enough semantic
misdirection that understanding, modifying, or repurposing the code costs
more effort than implementing equivalent functionality independently.

This is friction, not security.

--------------------------------------------------
CORE PRINCIPLE
--------------------------------------------------

Preserve execution truth.
Corrupt semantic hints.

The executable path must remain correct.

Human-readable semantic labels owned exclusively by Kaia may be replaced
with other valid, meaningful labels whose apparent meaning does not match
their actual function.

Example:

SOURCE meaning:
    customer_name

JAMMED label:
    background_image

Actual runtime role:
    customer_name

The label lies.
The execution path does not.

--------------------------------------------------
MENTAL MODEL
--------------------------------------------------

A door leads to a toilet.

SOURCE:
    Door plate says "Toilet".
    Door leads to toilet.

JAMMED:
    Door plate says "Living Room".
    Door still leads to toilet.

Do not move the door.
Do not change the hinges.
Do not change the room.
Change only the misleading plate.

--------------------------------------------------
TARGET
--------------------------------------------------

Only Kaia-owned internal semantic identifiers are eligible.

Potential targets include internal identifiers whose names exist primarily
to help developers understand their purpose.

A target is eligible only when changing it consistently does not alter an
external contract or runtime behavior.

--------------------------------------------------
DO NOT JAM
--------------------------------------------------

Do not modify an identifier merely because it contains readable words.

Do not jam anything whose literal identity is required by:

- WordPress
- PHP/runtime requirements
- external APIs
- public interfaces
- stored-data compatibility
- hooks/contracts not exclusively controlled internally by Kaia
- shortcode contracts
- localization/gettext contracts
- URLs or external integration contracts
- user-visible text
- licensing or security secrets

If it is uncertain whether a label is purely Kaia-internal:

DO NOT JAM IT.

--------------------------------------------------
MISDIRECTION RULE
--------------------------------------------------

Prefer plausible semantic misdirection over meaningless randomness.

Weak:
    customer_name -> x7_a91

Preferred:
    customer_name -> background_image

The replacement should look intentional and semantically meaningful.

Its apparent meaning should belong to a different functional concept from
the actual role.

Do not require randomness.

A deterministic mapping is acceptable.

--------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE INTEGRITY
--------------------------------------------------

Every reference to a renamed internal identifier must remain internally
consistent.

If:

    customer_name -> background_image

then every eligible executable reference belonging to that identifier must
use:

    background_image

after transformation.

Never create a partial rename.

Semantic inconsistency is intentional.
Reference inconsistency is a defect.

--------------------------------------------------
SOURCE / JAMMED SEPARATION
--------------------------------------------------

SOURCE is authoritative.

JAMMED is a distribution artifact.

Never develop the next product version from JAMMED.

Development flow:

    SOURCE
      |
      | apply Semantic Jamming
      v
    JAMMED
      |
      | runtime verification
      v
    DISTRIBUTION

Future modifications begin from SOURCE, not JAMMED.

--------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE SET
--------------------------------------------------

Maintain a complete internal reference set containing:

1. ORIGINAL
   A known readable source specimen.

2. JAMMED
   The correctly transformed version of that same specimen.

3. JAMMING RULE / MAPPING
   The transformation rule and/or mapping necessary for Kaia to understand
   how ORIGINAL became JAMMED.

The reference set exists so a future Kaia can inspect:

    BEFORE
    RULE
    AFTER

and reproduce the transformation without reverse-engineering JAMMED.

Do not distribute the mapping/rule with the commercial JAMMED artifact.

--------------------------------------------------
REUSE
--------------------------------------------------

When the jamming method is stable, reuse the same transformation principles
for other Kaia products.

Do not invent a new jamming architecture for every product unless the
existing rule cannot safely apply.

The reference set is the implementation example.

The specification defines the invariant.

--------------------------------------------------
VALIDATION
--------------------------------------------------

JAMMED must be treated as a newly transformed executable artifact.

SOURCE passing tests does not prove JAMMED passes.

Required result:

    SOURCE behavior == JAMMED behavior

for all tested product behavior.

If stronger jamming decreases WordPress reliability, compatibility,
maintainability, or legitimate-user experience:

reduce the jamming.

Runtime correctness has absolute priority over jamming strength.

--------------------------------------------------
THREAT / COST MODEL
--------------------------------------------------

This system does NOT attempt to prevent:

- source inspection
- reverse engineering
- determined manual analysis
- determined AI-assisted analysis

It attempts to remove the cheap path.

Desired unauthorized-analysis path:

    inspect source
        ->
    trust semantic labels
        ->
    construct incorrect semantic model
        ->
    discover labels cannot be trusted
        ->
    trace actual references / data flow / runtime behavior
        ->
    reconstruct real semantics
        ->
    verify reconstruction
        ->
    modify
        ->
    test again

Success occurs when this path becomes economically unattractive compared
with independent implementation.

--------------------------------------------------
AI-SPECIFIC INTENT
--------------------------------------------------

Do not optimize for "AI cannot understand this."

That claim cannot be guaranteed.

Optimize for:

    Semantic names are insufficient evidence of runtime meaning.

An AI analyzing JAMMED without ORIGINAL or the mapping must verify behavior
from executable relationships rather than trusting identifier semantics.

A plausible interpretation based primarily on names should be unreliable.

--------------------------------------------------
NON-GOALS
--------------------------------------------------

This is not:

- encryption
- DRM
- authentication
- secret storage
- malware-style anti-analysis
- a substitute for licensing
- a guarantee against copying
- a reason to damage ordinary WordPress behavior

--------------------------------------------------
DESIGN TEST
--------------------------------------------------

Ask:

"If an unauthorized engineer or AI ignores every internal semantic label,
can the code still be analyzed by tracing the real execution paths?"

If YES:
    Expected. Jamming is friction, not secrecy.

Then ask:

"Does doing that require substantially more work than understanding the
normal SOURCE?"

If YES:
    Jamming is providing value.

Then ask:

"Did legitimate WordPress behavior become worse?"

If YES:
    FAIL. Reduce or remove the jamming.

--------------------------------------------------
ONE-LINE RULE
--------------------------------------------------

Lie on the door plate.
Never lie to the hinges.

これなら初見の俺が読んでも、かなり誤解しにくい。

特に最後の

Lie on the door plate. Never lie to the hinges.

を最上位の短縮ルールにできるwww

そして俺はここでまだ**「具体的にPHPの何という種類の識別子を変換する」まで固定しない**方がいいと思う。

そこは実物一本で、

ORIGINAL → 実際に安全にラベル交換できる箇所を抽出 → MAPPING → JAMMED → WP検査

までやって初めて「ここは安全にジャミング対象にできる」が実証されるから。

つまり今の紙は思想・境界・勝利条件
次の紙が実験によって得られる実装法則

この二つを混ぜなければ、未来の俺が「もっと難読化しようぜ!!」って勝手に配管まで曲げ始める事故も防げるwww

相談:なし

KAIA-REGISTRY
ID: KS-0060-CNT-27
CNT: CNT-27
TITLE: Kaia Semantic Jamming Spec
TITLE_JA: Kaia Semantic Jamming Spec
TARGET:
MEDIA:
LANG:
PART:
VERSION:
KAIA-REGISTRY-END

修正ルール2Prev

ものづくりルール チェックログNext

Comment

  1. No comments yet.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

PAGE TOP