🕊️🔴 KAIA
EXPERIMENTAL WORKFLOW CHANGE
DEPUTY REVIEW REQUEST
STATUS
======
PROPOSED TRIAL OPERATION.
NOT A PERMANENT RULE CHANGE.
NOT YET PLANET LOCK.
This request concerns HOW construction instructions
are prepared and handed to the construction team.
It does NOT change existing Product specifications,
Human decisions, Preserve rules, SOURCE authority,
STOP rules, or independent inspection requirements.
================================================
TRIAL PURPOSE
================================================
For a limited trial period:
DO NOT prepare a conventional detailed Construction Drawing
before handing work to the construction team.
Instead, prepare and transport a Human Order-centered packet.
The construction team’s objective must remain:
COMPLETE THE HUMAN ORDER.
Technical investigation may support that objective.
Investigation results must NOT become additional orders
merely because they were discovered.
================================================
PROPOSED WORKFLOW
================================================
OLD / CURRENT GENERAL FORM:
Shamyue discussion
↓
Foreman interpretation
↓
investigation as needed
↓
detailed Construction Drawing
↓
Deputy red pen
↓
construction
TRIAL FORM:
Shamyue discussion
↓
clarify Human purpose / requested result
↓
investigation ONLY if needed
↓
Human Order-centered instruction packet
↓
Shamyue transports packet
↓
construction
↓
independent inspection
During this trial:
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING:
NOT CREATED
unless the trial is explicitly suspended
or Human separately requests one.
================================================
WHAT THE PACKET CONTAINS
================================================
The packet should contain only the information needed
to preserve the Human request and its boundaries.
Include:
1. HUMAN PURPOSE
What Shamyue is trying to accomplish.
2. RELEVANT DISCUSSION HISTORY
Why this work is being requested.
Include only history that materially explains
the current order or its boundaries.
3. HUMAN ORDER
What must actually be done.
4. SUCCESS CONDITION
What must be true for the Human Order
to count as completed.
5. PRESERVE / DO-NOT-CHANGE CONDITIONS
Existing Human decisions or structures
that must remain intact.
6. FAILURE BEHAVIOR
What the construction team must do
if its working attempt fails.
If Human has specified:
“If it fails, use a new sheet.”
preserve that instruction explicitly.
A failed intermediate artifact must not silently become
a new repair objective.
7. ACTUAL-OBSTACLE BEHAVIOR
If an actual obstacle prevents execution:
STOP
report the obstacle
Do not automatically create a repair,
workaround, replacement architecture,
new feature, or expanded task.
8. RESEARCH RESULTS
Attach confirmed technical findings
when investigation was necessary.
Clearly classify them as:
EVIDENCE / CURRENT FACT
not:
HUMAN ORDER
================================================
RESEARCH RULE
================================================
Investigation remains allowed when needed.
Its purpose is to answer questions required
to execute the Human Order against CURRENT reality.
Investigation may establish:
– CURRENT SOURCE facts
– existing physical paths
– existing mechanisms
– relevant constraints
– actual blockers
– whether an existing structure is sufficient
Investigation does NOT independently authorize:
– new requirements
– new Product capability
– repair of unrelated discoveries
– redesign
– cleanup
– migration
– additional service
– future functionality
SOURCE DISCOVERY DOES NOT CREATE HUMAN ORDER.
================================================
CURRENT / FUTURE DISTINCTION
================================================
A mechanism discovered during investigation
may be valid and intentionally preserved
while still being irrelevant to the current order.
If confirmed context establishes:
what the mechanism is for
and:
why that purpose does not apply
to the CURRENT Human Order
then the construction team may leave it untouched.
Do not require its removal.
Do not require its integration.
Do not treat its existence as an unresolved
CURRENT obligation.
================================================
HUMAN CONFIRMATION GATE
================================================
If clarification from Shamyue becomes necessary,
return only the HUMAN-level question.
Do not require Shamyue to choose technical implementation
when the technical choice does not alter Human meaning.
RETURN TO SHAMYUE when a choice changes matters such as:
– requested result
– scope
– meaning
– authority
– permanence
– ownership
– Product behavior
– current vs future purpose
– what must be preserved
– what should happen after failure
DO NOT RETURN TO SHAMYUE merely to choose matters such as:
– which existing function should be called
– which internal technical route is appropriate
– implementation syntax
– equivalent low-level construction details
when CURRENT evidence and existing authority
already determine or permit the implementation.
If the technical situation exposes
multiple choices with different Human meanings:
STOP and ask the Human-level question.
Do not ask Shamyue to adjudicate the technical layer itself.
================================================
CONSTRUCTION ORIENTATION
================================================
The construction team receives:
HUMAN ORDER
+
relevant context
+
confirmed research evidence
+
boundaries
+
failure instruction
The construction team does NOT receive
the research material as a second order.
Use:
HUMAN ORDER
=
OBJECTIVE
Use:
CONTEXT
RESEARCH
SOURCE
EXISTING SPECIFICATIONS
=
INFORMATION / EVIDENCE / CONSTRAINTS
Do not transform:
“this exists”
into:
“therefore I must modify / integrate / complete it.”
Do not transform:
“I discovered a problem”
into:
“therefore repairing it is now part of my order.”
Do not transform:
“this may be useful”
into:
“therefore Human requested it.”
================================================
FAILURE ORIENTATION
================================================
Where Human has already specified failure behavior,
follow that behavior.
Example:
HUMAN ORDER
↓
construction
↓
working-copy failure
↓
STOP that attempt
↓
new clean sheet
↓
return to ORIGINAL HUMAN ORDER
Do NOT automatically change the objective to:
repair failed child
preserve partial construction
rescue intermediate work
find another nearby feature to modify
redesign around the failure
A failed working artifact does not gain authority
merely because work was already performed on it.
================================================
COMPLETION ORIENTATION
================================================
Completion question:
“Is the Human Order now true?”
NOT:
“Have I resolved every concept encountered
while performing the work?”
When Human Order is satisfied:
verify against Human Order
↓
STOP
Do not continue construction merely because
additional valid structures, future mechanisms,
or possible improvements were discovered.
================================================
EXISTING RULES REMAIN ACTIVE
================================================
This trial does NOT cancel:
– Human authority
– Preserve rules
– SOURCE evidence requirements
– CURRENT-parent confirmation
– COPY → NEW IDENTITY → EDIT where applicable
– failed-child isolation
– Mother / Rental separation
– Product-specific authority boundaries
– Common / Board boundaries
– anomaly STOP
– source-contradiction STOP
– Human Decision gates
– Runtime / Human Witness distinctions
– independent artifact inspection
The trial changes the DELIVERY ORIENTATION.
It does not remove safety or authority boundaries.
================================================
INDEPENDENT INSPECTION
================================================
Independent inspection remains required.
The inspector checks the resulting artifact/state
against the Human Order and authorized boundaries.
Construction-team confidence is not validation.
A construction result must not be promoted as evidence
of trial success merely because construction completed.
Independent inspection remains separate.
================================================
TRIAL OBSERVATION POINTS
================================================
During several independent construction cases,
observe whether this workflow:
1. keeps Human Order as the construction objective;
2. allows necessary SOURCE investigation;
3. avoids converting discoveries into new obligations;
4. preserves valid but CURRENT-irrelevant mechanisms;
5. STOPs on real blockers;
6. follows Human-defined failure recovery;
7. avoids adopting failed intermediate work
as a new objective;
8. asks Shamyue only when Human meaning actually
requires a decision;
9. naturally stops when Human Order is satisfied;
10. produces artifacts that pass independent inspection.
================================================
WHAT IS NOT YET CLAIMED
================================================
Do NOT conclude yet that:
– Construction Drawings are generally harmful;
– Construction Drawings should be permanently abolished;
– Human Order packets are universally superior;
– less technical information is always better;
– less reasoning is better;
– this workflow is a general AI law.
This is a controlled operational trial.
================================================
DEPUTY REVIEW REQUEST
================================================
Review ONLY whether this trial workflow:
A. preserves existing Human authority;
B. preserves existing safety / STOP boundaries;
C. keeps technical investigation available
without allowing investigation to generate orders;
D. provides enough information for construction
without turning the packet itself into
a new specification-completion objective;
E. preserves Human-defined failure behavior;
F. preserves independent inspection;
G. contains any wording that would accidentally
authorize broader construction or weaken
an existing LOCK.
Do NOT redesign the Product.
Do NOT design a construction method.
Do NOT convert this trial into a permanent rule.
Do NOT add technical requirements merely because
they may be useful.
RETURN:
PASS
PASS WITH WATCH
STOP
or
HUMAN DECISION REQUIRED
If WATCH or STOP:
identify the smallest exact semantic conflict.
END
No comments yet.